Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat
Two more neurologists speak on the value of MRIs in Terri's case:

Dr. Peter Morin...is a researcher specializing in degenerative brain diseases, and has both an M.D. and a Ph.D. in biochemistry from Boston University.

In the course of my conversation with Dr. Morin, he made reference to the standard use of MRI and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans to diagnose the extent of brain injuries. He seemed to assume that these had been done for Terri. I stopped him and told him that these tests have never been done for her; that Michael had refused them.

There was a moment of dead silence.

“That’s criminal,” he said, and then asked, in a tone of utter incredulity: “How can he continue as guardian? People are deliberating over this woman’s life and death and there’s been no MRI or PET?” He drew a reasonable conclusion: “These people [Michael Schiavo, George Felos, and Judge Greer] don’t want the information.”

Dr. Morin explained that he would feel obligated to obtain the information in these tests before making a diagnosis with life and death consequences. I told him that CT (Computer-Aided Tomography) scans had been done, and were partly the basis for the finding of PVS. The doctor retorted, “Spare no expense, eh?” I asked him to explain the comment; he said that a CT scan is a much less expensive test than an MRI, but it “only gives you a tenth of the information an MRI does.” He added, “A CT scan is useful only in pretty severe cases, such as trauma, and also during the few days after an anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain injury. It’s useful in an emergency-room setting. But if the question is ischemic injury [brain damage caused by lack of blood/oxygen to part of the brain] you want an MRI and PET. For subsequent evaluation of brain injury, the CT is pretty useless unless there has been a massive stroke.”

Other neurologists have concurred with Dr. Morin’s opinion. Dr. Thomas Zabiega, who trained at the University of Chicago, said, “Any neurologist who is objective would say ‘Yes’” to the question, “Should Terri be given an MRI?”

1,540 posted on 03/19/2005 11:01:15 PM PST by Petronski (If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1530 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

Haven't you heard that Terri can't have an MRI cause they implanted a metal object into her brain, or some have claimed?

Look like all their bases have been covered or so they think.


1,543 posted on 03/19/2005 11:03:20 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski; AndrewC; FairOpinion

you all have provided some very valuable information on this thread.

Thank you.


1,549 posted on 03/19/2005 11:09:10 PM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
re: Two more neurologists speak on the value of MRIs in Terri's case:

Thanks for posting this information.

1,555 posted on 03/19/2005 11:15:21 PM PST by tarheelswamprat (Negotiations are the heroin of Westerners addicted to self-delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

I suppose Dr. Hammesfahr was lieing or simply incompetant when he swore a deposition stating the MRI scans had been misrepresented ?


http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Hammesfahr%20Aff%20060101.pdf


1,693 posted on 03/20/2005 8:44:39 AM PST by RS (Keeping them honest since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson