Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Don Munn

He is a limited public figure in anything related to this situation.

Probably us calling him an adulterer would be outside that bound.

But, it is the truth, so I don't worry about him suing me.


1,146 posted on 03/19/2005 4:42:53 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1116 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas

As a good Presbyterian you know the Old Testament teaching on adultery, and the penalty for it.


1,150 posted on 03/19/2005 4:46:24 PM PST by Lexinom (You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1146 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
My point being, it was posted he couldn't sue as he was a public figure, that he can sue for libel and slander.

Many public figures have done so and won or settled out of court.

Politicians are a different manner but he has not held elective office.

1,151 posted on 03/19/2005 4:46:32 PM PST by Don Munn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson