Posted on 03/19/2005 11:30:38 AM PST by Ravi
Just heard on Fox that U.S. Senate will convene today in emergency session regarding Terri Schiavo.
If she is a Catholic she sure is not a good one. As far as I know commiting adultry and having 2 kids with a married man are also a sin. Also he could get an annulment so it would have been as if the marriage didn't happen. Frankly I don't think she has this view. I think Miky baby has been saying it so he doesn't have to marry the ho.
What a great post!!! I get so sick and tired of all the naive, ignorant dupes posting here that are just clueless as to what really going on in this case.
"Dr." K wasn't treating anybody. He killed a woman with "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome".
REad the post, those drs. hired by terri's parents said they believed she could have improvement. You left out that part. Was that your intention to make a point?
:You should have included the entire part about what her parents' attorneys really said. Unless of course you just wanted to make a point.
Bravo.
Those who believe in the sanctity of Teri's life are duty-bound to fight foer her, and that includes senators and congressmen.
"Doctors hired by Terri's parents did not dispute the physical damage done to Terri, but they claim there are new therapies that could improve her condition. In two separate trials, the trial court found such claims of potential improvement to be without merit."
If there were 'new' therapies available that could have improved her condition, then why would any judge dismiss this information out of hand?
What evidence did the judge base his decision on that the therapies were 'without merit'?
Why would the judge only consider the court appointed doctors and not Terri's doctors?
Too many questions here.
Thank you.
Thank you. Maybe smartypants Hildy doesn't know what Munchausen Syndrome is in regards to her calling it a stupid remark. If that is the case, look at the pot calling the kettle black. :-)
I just had a thought. If I worked in that hospice I would have been preparing for the worst. Anyone think it's possible that a staff member loaded Terri up with nutients, etc. to fortify her in case of an upcoming ordeal to bide more time for her? Is it even possible?
Years? From your source:
February 1990… Terri suffers cardiac arrest and a severe loss of oxygen to her brain
May 1990… Terri leaves hospital and is brought to a rehabiliation center for aggressive therapy
July 1990… Terri is brought to the home where her husband and parents live; after a few weeks, she is brought back to the rehabilitation center
November 1990… Terri is taken to California for experimental therapies
January 1991… Terri is returned to Florida and placed at a rehabilitation center in Brandon
July 1991… Terri is transfered to a skilled nursing facility where she receives aggressive physical therapy and speech therapy
May 1992… Michael and the Schindlers stop living together
January 1993… Michael recovers $1 million settlement for medical malpractice claim involving Terri's care; jury had ruled in Michael's favor on allegations Terri's doctors failed to diagnose her bulimia, which led to her heart failure; case settled while on appeal
Near as I can tell...2 years.
I never thought of that....LOLOL
My God, he said that? Michael Sciavo?
He should have been a vet so he could put living creatures down.
Apparently, the hospice people have no discretion in dealing with Terri -- it has always been minimal "care" for her on the orders of the popular MRS.
His parents are dead..he also had their feeding tubes removed..that's how he knows its a good thing
Got a response to this, Hildy?
Whoah! I have never seen NRO's report. I have not even menioned them by name. Not ever.
I saw it coming out of the horses mouth last night on Hannity and Colmes. It was the Shindler family. That is my source.
Who are you and why are you pinging me?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.