Posted on 03/19/2005 11:30:38 AM PST by Ravi
you may call it medical services ...
But where I come from it known as food and water
And I am well aware there are cases that there are no other options for a patient other then to let nature takes it's cause
My mother died last year .. long story short, her organs were shutting down
Though there was nothing we could do to save her medical .. we also did know deny her comfort
grrr
did know = did not
Dream about the difference between your dogs and Terri's smile and then decide if you will put your dog down tomorrow because he looks brain dead to you.
Thanks for Dr. Hammesfahr's affidavit. It does show that Judge Greer is ignoring testamony that is not in keeping with his prejudiced determination. He is one who is allowing the ends to justify the means. The idea of Terri Schiavo's PVS may be the ultimate court abuse that shall not be allowed to go unpunished. He has played a dangerous game. The scrutiny that he has brought upon his court conduct may be his undoing.
Baghdad Bob didn't do well at fooling anyone either, nor clinton for that matter.
Then again, if a person is thought by some to be brain dead it all depends on what your definition of is is.
Steve attained his seat in an unusual way. There was a four way primary and even though Steve got the most votes he did not have the required 35% so the delegates to the district convention were reconvened and there he eventually prevailed to become the nominee. From that point on, it's a cakewalk. I don't know why any Democrat even bothers running. He can be there as long as he likes.
LOL! That explains everything! The running around from poster to poster, being an annoyance by nipping at our ankles, desperately whimpering for attention....
Terri has had a guardian ad litem and numerous doctors look at her. Numberous courts. Numerous tests.
Does Terri have electrodes in her head? I ask for a specific reason and would like to know the answer.
We're in pretty good company then because Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Mark Levin, and a host of others are also "off the deep end".
By the way, the aforementioned are more than well-acquainted with Constitutional law.
When the dust clears from this episode maybe you and Hildy can tutor them and put 'em on the right path, eh?
Bye, Gettingbored."He's dead, Jim!"
Here's an opposing point of view, from another doctor:
http://doctorisin.blogspot.com/2004_12_01_doctorisin_archive.html
Thanks but I didn't need an opposing point of view. The supporting view was repugnant all by itself.
I will expect a flood of new appeals to US Reps., US Senators and The President to intervene in other civil matters that aren't resolved at the local and state level to one party or another's satisfaction?
Like this:
KRISTIE RIEKEN
Associated Press
March 15, 2005
Baby removed from life support in Texas
HOUSTON - A critically ill 5-month-old was taken off life support and died Tuesday, a day after a judge cleared the way for doctors to halt care they believed to be futile. The infant's mother had fought to keep him alive.
Sun Hudson had been diagnosed with a fatal genetic disorder called thanatophoric dysplasia, a condition characterized by a tiny chest and lungs too small to support life. He had been on a ventilator since birth.
Wanda Hudson unsuccessfully fought to continue her son's medical care. She believed he needed time to grow and could eventually be weaned off the ventilator.
"I wanted life for my son," Hudson said Tuesday. "The hospital gave up on him too soon."
Texas law allows hospitals to end life support in cases such as this but requires that families be given 10 days to find another facility to care for the patient. No hospital was found to take the baby.
The ethics committee at Texas Children's Hospital reviewed Sun's case before recommending that life support be stopped. Hospital officials also recommended the case be taken to court and offered to pay Hudson's attorney fees.
"Texas Children's Hospital is deeply saddened to report that Sun Hudson has died," the hospital said in a statement issued Tuesday.
Should the President of the United States have intervened in this case?
No, credible as in "not spewing inaccurate boilerplate." These people actually KNOW the law and aren't willing to toss it to the trash heap like some of you are.
IT's not right to take the alleged word of the spouse when no legal document exists. The spouse wasted no time moving on, and denied Terri therapy just as soon as he got the money awarded to him. Now he's living in Terri's house with his new slut. The reasons why Terri ended up in the hospital were also suspicous. And, her parents beg to differ with you!
Exactly. Because the bill they are going to pass today, if they can, also has a "sense of the Congress" thing it it requiring them to "explore" this issue of family and friends butting in. God himself could not know where these fools will go with that.
We are about to have an Act of Congress on Terri Schiavo with jurisdiction in the federal courts. Greer won't have any part in it.
Lay the blame where it belongs: Mr. Schiavo. His obstinacy forced this outcome.
If it's all drivel why is the Senate getting involved?
"And isn't it amazing to watch people defend this on the grounds that his wife isn't really alive, implying the marriage contract loses it's teeth based on her incapacited condition rendering his co-habitation and child producing justified, but then turn around and argue for her death based on the viability and sacrosanct nature of the marriage contract?"
AMEN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.