Yes, he was a "loving, adoring husband" until he got his hands on Terri's malpractice award. Then, he remembered she wanted him to make sure she died. Yesterday I heard Rep. Weldon on some talk radio show talking about this. He is also an MD. He said one of the things that struck him as odd about Michael Schiavo (and it ought to strike everyone as peculiar) was that in his practice of medicine, when the MD initially gives the husband, family, relative the probable diagnosis that things do not look good, and what will be needed to keep the person alive, that is when the husband says my wife would not want that feeding tube, respirator, etc.; he doesn't remember that later after he sues and gets the $.
The first several years, there is no disputing that Michael did everything he could to help Terri. Maybe, just maybe, he realized, because unlike any of you, he sees her everyday, she's not going to recover. It's then, after exhausting all the avenues, that he decides to let her go. Well, that just makes too much sense for some of you.
Michael hasn't make any money from this and there's no money to speak of left. I don't know how many times that has to be stated before some of you stop posting lies.
"Yes, he was a "loving, adoring husband" until he got his hands on Terri's malpractice award. Then, he remembered she wanted him to make sure she died."
Your statement doesn't even come close to reality.
Do you know what he did for her pertaining to her care? Did you know he had become beligerent when he felt her care wasn't adequate? Do you know he flew her to CA for special treatments and efforts to reverse her condition?
Do you know her parents went after money not given to care for her, but HIS MONEY!
Do you realize how long he waited and what caused his decision to remove the tube initially?
Obviously from your remarks you have not a clue one.