To: GeekDejure; Victoria Delsoul; kstewskis; Raquel; NYer
My gosh... what cowards these people like Boxer, and company are.
Don't anyone ever dare tell me that liberlism is defined as compassion, or for the common man. These people have no morals, and are soul-less.
To: Northern Yankee
My gosh... what cowards these people like Boxer, and company are.
Don't anyone ever dare tell me that liberlism is defined as compassion, or for the common man. These people have no morals, and are soul-less.
======
What else do you expect? They are liberals! Read me tag line !!!
21 posted on
03/18/2005 11:53:33 AM PST by
GeekDejure
( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
To: Northern Yankee; GeekDejure; Victoria Delsoul
My gosh... what cowards these people like Boxer, and company are. Boxer is a died-in-the-wool, Socialistic, bedeviled, irrational, evil hag.
She has no morals, is a long term pro-death flag waver, and is hell-bent (like Greer, M. Shiavo, and Felos) on making sure Terri dies. She (as well as Wyden and Levin) knows exactly what she/they is/are doing when it comes to deliberately starving Terri to death.
Wild animals are not treated this inhumanely.
Liberal compassion? NOT. It's a lie, because "liberal" is too conservative of a term to describe these cretins who disragard life.
There is no way this is a "right to die" case...it's a "right to live" case.
Satan is very proud of his minions tonight. Very proud.
85 posted on
03/18/2005 6:44:07 PM PST by
kstewskis
("Tolerance is what happens when one loses their principles"....Fr. A Saenz.)
To: Northern Yankee
It is not cowardice we're witnessing with the democrat obstruction regarding Terri's unalienable right to LIFE. Think: what will the implications be for the alive unborn who are proven to be even more cognizant than Terri has been shown to be? ... The democrat party has staked their future on protecting the serial killing euphemistically called 'choice'. In this case, it is Michael Schiavo's choice, his liberty and pursuit of happiness free of a disabled wife, that is primary to the democrats, for if this disabled woman is protected from being killed, then the entire notion of a right to slaughter aware unborn alive children in late term aborticutions the democrats have defended on the grounds that a woman's health (read choice or mental satisfaction or avoidance of responsibility to a child) is at risk of being exposed for the insane agenda it is. This 'husband' is in a longterm adulterous affair with two children by his consort and has spent the funds awarded by courts for the therapy for Terri ... and the money has been spent in so many ways that have nothing to do with therapy for Terri with the blessing of Judge Greer and the Floriduh judiciary. In a not so subtle way, this determination to put Terri down on the grounds that she hasn't a 'worthy LIFE' is directly connected to the democrat party agenda of abortion on demand.
96 posted on
03/18/2005 8:44:32 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson