Replies

It is not cowardice we're witnessing with the democrat obstruction regarding Terri's unalienable right to LIFE. Think: what will the implications be for the alive unborn who are proven to be even more cognizant than Terri has been shown to be? ... The democrat party has staked their future on protecting the serial killing euphemistically called 'choice'. In this case, it is Michael Schiavo's choice, his liberty and pursuit of happiness free of a disabled wife, that is primary to the democrats, for if this disabled woman is protected from being killed, then the entire notion of a right to slaughter aware unborn alive children in late term aborticutions the democrats have defended on the grounds that a woman's health (read choice or mental satisfaction or avoidance of responsibility to a child) is at risk of being exposed for the insane agenda it is. This 'husband' is in a longterm adulterous affair with two children by his consort and has spent the funds awarded by courts for the therapy for Terri ... and the money has been spent in so many ways that have nothing to do with therapy for Terri with the blessing of Judge Greer and the Floriduh judiciary. In a not so subtle way, this determination to put Terri down on the grounds that she hasn't a 'worthy LIFE' is directly connected to the democrat party agenda of abortion on demand.