Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

18 posted on 03/18/2005 6:55:30 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

Relative risk is not statistically significant until it exceeds 2.0, feel free to continue to use your table tho'.


25 posted on 03/18/2005 7:23:08 AM PST by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

The RR's don't reach 2 and are thus statistically insignificant.


28 posted on 03/18/2005 7:33:13 AM PST by Gabz (Wanna join my tag team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

What is the point of that chart?


38 posted on 03/18/2005 9:25:54 AM PST by Protagoras (If the Republican Party enacts a new tax they will be out of power for at least a generation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa
Ray, Ray, why do you post a useless chart?

No researcher worth their salt will even begin to accept a RR of less than 2, and most will discount the RR until it hits 3.

Ray, Ray, why do you continue to try to beat upon people KNOWING that they can counter you at every turn, unless you actually lie or use the state to enforce your wishes?

52 posted on 03/18/2005 9:58:51 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson