They do have experience in handling old carriers 
Posted on 03/18/2005 6:15:17 AM PST by robowombat
Navy defends decision to retire carrier From CongressDaily
Pressed by Senate appropriators, the top Navy officials Wednesday strongly defended their decision to retire the Mayport, Fla.-based aircraft carrier USS John F. Kennedy and warned that if forced to retain the ship they would have to take money from more important programs. Navy Secretary Gordon England went on to predict that the active carrier force could drop below 11 ships without regard to what decision was made on the Kennedy.
"It's not clear to me that it always stay at 11," England told the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee. "As capabilities increase, we could go down."
The Navy's plans in the fiscla 2006 budget to retire the Kennedy this year triggered an outcry by both the Florida congressional delegation and pro-Navy lawmakers from other states.
England and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark were questioned by Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who said he and ranking member Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, were concerned about the shrinking Navy fleet.
Stevens asked if they would be disturbed if Congress orders them to retain the Kennedy.
"Yes sir, we would be terribly disturbed to keep Kennedy where it is," England replied, saying that would be "expensive for us and it's a marginal capability."
England then added that the money to operate the Kennedy and put it through a long and expensive overhaul had been dropped from the 2006 budget. If forced to keep it on active duty, "we would need to take the money from elsewhere," he said.
Clark added although the Navy planned to keep its nuclear-powered carriers operational for 50 years, the 38-year-old Kennedy, which is not nuclear-powered, should be retired because it had never been modernized.
Or Japan ;)
Rechristen it the USS Free Republic or USS James C. Robinson.
Uncle Teddy would explode like Mr. Creosote!
India or BanglaDesh more likely
For the life of me I cannot understand why the LLL is so upset by the Navy's action. You would think the Navy was killing someone's child. And think about it ... it's not very likely that JFK would be a democRAT in today's world. He would find himself more aligned with today's right than today's left.
Brazil wouldn't be such a bad choice given Chavez acting up and all.
How fitting for a ship named the Kennedy!
It's worse: they are taking away Mayport, Florida's gravy train.
it was also believed to be bad luck -- much misery followed the JFK during her voyages -- and sailors are a superstitious bunch anyway.
Send it to India. It's got to be better than any French or Soviet model they've been promised.
They do have experience in handling old carriers
Actually, during the first Gulf War, the USS Acadia (AO tender), was nicknamed the love boat. The ship when on station in the Persian Gulf, and roughly 25-30% of the females came back several months pregnant. They were gone over six months, or so, IIRC.
Saw a documentary about those Indian ship salvages (like in the pic). They full steam that sucker into shore at high tide and from the air it looks like an ant attack at low tide. Single file coming an going. Awesome spectacle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.