Skip to comments.
Liberals vs. liberals - (more on the Susan Estrich L.A.Times flap)
WASHINGTON TIMES.COM ^
| MARCH 17, 2005
| BURT PRELUTSKY
Posted on 03/17/2005 9:23:32 AM PST by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
03/17/2005 9:23:40 AM PST
by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
The worst thing about Miss Estrich and the other members of her overly pampered platoon is that they're hypocrites. No, Burt. The worst thing about them is that they're totalitarians and elitists. Hypocrisy (or inconsistency) is just a distraction ... it's the agenda that really matters.
2
posted on
03/17/2005 9:35:13 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
To: CHARLITE
When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!
3
posted on
03/17/2005 9:37:37 AM PST
by
Tacis
("John ("What SF-180?") Kerry - Still Shilling For Those Who Would Harm America!")
To: Tacis
When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters! WHOO WHOO!
To: Tacis
"When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters!"
You have a heathy and balanced perspective, sir. Have a saint Patty's Day pint and a Bushmills on me!
5
posted on
03/17/2005 9:42:12 AM PST
by
Mongeaux
To: Tax-chick
No, the worst thing about Miss Estrich is her voice. (Second is her looks.)
I can't take credit for this, but someone not long ago described Estrich's voice as Harvery Fierstein doing Carol Channing. Oddly enough, I think that's a pretty far description.
TS
6
posted on
03/17/2005 9:52:15 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Anyone going to Lunacon, March 18-20, 2005 in NJ?)
To: Tanniker Smith
the worst thing about Miss Estrich is her voiceDang, that's the truth! We had to turn off the sound on election night, and I even took off my glasses so I didn't have to look at her.
7
posted on
03/17/2005 9:53:41 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
To: Tax-chick
When she starts talking, I am immediately reminded of the face of a 50 pound channel catfish.
To: tom paine 2
LOL - I've seen that catfish. Looked like he (she? - do catfish have gender?) could swallow a toddler in one gulp.
9
posted on
03/17/2005 10:02:03 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(Private enterprise or private charity ... SAY NO TO SOCIALISM!)
To: tom paine 2
I was thinking more along the lines of a monkfish...
10
posted on
03/17/2005 10:05:32 AM PST
by
astounded
(We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
To: Mongeaux
Hey!! Can I get one those Bushmill's on you??
11
posted on
03/17/2005 10:14:19 AM PST
by
chesley
To: Tacis
When urged to pick sides in disputes involving female liberals against female liberals, I always side with the honey with the biggest hooters! I thought ALL liberals were big boobs.
12
posted on
03/17/2005 10:19:49 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
To: CHARLITE
I've read Burt's book. It was very good.
13
posted on
03/17/2005 12:07:23 PM PST
by
JZelle
To: CHARLITE
14
posted on
03/17/2005 12:09:51 PM PST
by
JZelle
To: CHARLITE
15
posted on
03/17/2005 12:11:18 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: Tacis
But, but, but...Michael Kinsley is at a disadvantage here...no hooters.
I do think he and Ralph Nader share the same pair of glasses though.
To: Tacis
LOLOLOL!!!! Excellent choice!!
17
posted on
03/17/2005 12:19:57 PM PST
by
PaRebel
(Cosmos/chaos)
To: ChadGore
Wow. That is one scary picture. Estrich is hypocritical and unreasonable, and from what I have read on this debate, willing to use despicable tactics. Apparently, she has threatened defamation lawsuits over this whole thing already.. and she's the one who is using her opponent's illness in the debate!
18
posted on
03/17/2005 12:21:16 PM PST
by
LiveBait
To: LiveBait; Tacis; ChadGore; nothingnew; ThreePuttinDude; Congressman Billybob; jan in Colorado; ...
Does anyone know if Fox has fired her? Has she been seen on Fox since Nov. 2nd? She was a "regular," but I haven't seen her recently.
19
posted on
03/17/2005 3:05:24 PM PST
by
CHARLITE
(Women are powerful; freedom is beautiful.........and STUPID IS FOREVER!)
To: CHARLITE
If you're a liberal, why would you take on the L.A. Times?
20
posted on
03/17/2005 3:06:29 PM PST
by
mowkeka
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
