Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spodefly

You know, if it were just this issue alone, it wouldn't bother me so much. But if you think about the ACLU's history....I could see them argue for a nudist teen camp, and that if NAMBLA members were not allowed to work there it would be discrimination. As a matter of fact, they would argue that if these NAMBLA members were found to possess photos of actual child porn, perhaps that they commit theirself, that it should not be a crime to possess it. All that follows the logic of the ACLU.

And I'm not trying to exaggerate. I could really see them arguing some crazy stuff like that!

Scary!


17 posted on 03/16/2005 3:57:14 PM PST by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Jay777

And I'm not trying to exaggerate

you are not, and it is well within the realms of their creepiness.


18 posted on 03/16/2005 4:01:23 PM PST by deepFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson