Oh, and did you think the red head was the only jury member? And as I've said several times now, if you are really interested in learning more about why the jury found Scott Peterson guilty, why don't you do research on the internet? In the time you've spent posting your drivel filled name calling post, you could have found countless facts.
But you aren't interested in learning anything about the case. You just want to pontificate and condemn those who believe Peterson is guilty. And yet you admit you didn't pay attention to the case. And don't see anything wrong with condemning those who did pay attention and found him guilty. That's sad.
Countless facts my foot. You can't find one single irrefutable evidence to name for me. You are so preoccupied with my spellings instead of stating the facts. I simply made a big mistake thinking that I can carry a rational or intellectual discussion with you or your like. For me, I don't know Scott, or his wife, and I would like to be impartial in my feelings and judgment, however, that seems to be difficult for you.