Countless facts my foot. You can't find one single irrefutable evidence to name for me. You are so preoccupied with my spellings instead of stating the facts. I simply made a big mistake thinking that I can carry a rational or intellectual discussion with you or your like. For me, I don't know Scott, or his wife, and I would like to be impartial in my feelings and judgment, however, that seems to be difficult for you.
You want to be impartial about a case that's over and trial testimony has been reported, word for word? Be my guest. Go read it and report back to me.
Until then, there's no sense discussing something with someone who doesn't know anything about the case.
How impartial have you been? For someone who hasn't paid attention to the case (your words), you've called a juror a bimbo. And accused freepers who have paid attention to the case as being led by the media. That's not being impartial. That's having a reading comprehension problem.
Now, I've already told you where the information about actual court testimony could be located. You've ignored that and asked freepers to give you 6 months worth of testimony on a thread that doesn't even deal with Scott Peterson.
So go do a little reading and educate yourself before you accuse others of being ignorant. The only one who has shown her ignorance here is you.