I did not say he was innocent, I don't know because I did not follow the trial closely, however, from general headlines and TV news I DID NOT SEE ANY SMOKING GUN EVIDENSES. I am saying, may be I missed it. But, you and all the hang him crowd are not interested in the truth or the facts simply because the media told you he is evil because he cheated on his wife.
In the time that you could have written four lines responding sarcastically, and accusing me in defending the evil killer, you could have said, so and so witnessed him killing her, or they found a knife with his finger prints on it near the bay, or her bloodied dress was found in his car,.....
As a matter of fact many killers have had LIFE IN PRISON with much more evidences than that (OJ is one). Honesty is not important when you hate somebody. The media made us hate that dude, because his wife had a pretty smile, and was pregnant, and HE HAD AN AFFAIR!
For a couple of years empty headed American followed the trial of Peterson or the killing of the little girl by the name Bonet Ramzy, or whatever stupid subject that our media choose to get our retarded population to be occupied with rather than getting interested in two subjects that controls our lives and destiny; namely POLITICS & RELIGION! We are told since childhood not to discuss politics or religion. If you don't discuss politics, how are you going to claim that you live in a democracy? If you don't discuss religion, how are you going to find the truth?
Our media rather have us all preoccupied with OJ trial, Peterson Trial, Brad Pitt divorce, sport news, and other unimportant subjects. Well informed population is too challenging to the power base. Granted I may have gone out on a tangent here, but, I was trying to illustrate the reason I don't focus on stupid tid bits that the media wants to feed us.
You aren't making sense, have contradicted yourself and your spelling and grammar are atrocious.
Oh, and did you think the red head was the only jury member? And as I've said several times now, if you are really interested in learning more about why the jury found Scott Peterson guilty, why don't you do research on the internet? In the time you've spent posting your drivel filled name calling post, you could have found countless facts.
But you aren't interested in learning anything about the case. You just want to pontificate and condemn those who believe Peterson is guilty. And yet you admit you didn't pay attention to the case. And don't see anything wrong with condemning those who did pay attention and found him guilty. That's sad.
Two questions, "conservlib": 1. Is English your first language? 2. Where did you learn how to spell?