Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Votes to Allow Arctic Drilling...
yahoo.com ^ | March 16, 2004 | JOSEF HEBERT

Posted on 03/16/2005 11:14:55 AM PST by crushelits

WASHINGTON - Amid the backdrop of soaring oil and gasoline prices, a sharply divided Senate on Wednesday voted to open the ecologically rich Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, delivering a major energy policy win for President Bush (news - web sites).
he Senate, by a 51-49 vote, rejected an attempt by Democrats and GOP moderates to remove a refuge drilling provision from next year's budget, preventing opponents from using a filibuster — a tactic that has blocked repeated past attempts to open the Alaska refuge to oil companies.

The action, assuming Congress agrees on a budget, clears the way for approving drilling in the refuge later this year, drilling supporters said.

The oil industry has sought for more than two decades to get access to what is believed to be billions of barrels of oil beneath the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the northern eastern corner of Alaska.

Environmentalists have fought such development and argued that despite improve environmental controls a web of pipelines and drilling platforms would harm calving caribou, polar bears and millions of migratory birds that use the coastal plain.

Bush has called tapping the reserve's oil a critical part of the nation's energy security and a way to reduce America's reliance on imported oil, which account for more than half of the 20 million barrels of crude use daily. The Alaska refuge could supply as much as 1 million barrels day at peak production, drilling supporters said.

"We won't see this oil for 10 years. It will have minimal impact," argued Sen. Maria Cantwell (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., a co-sponsor of the amendment that would have stripped the arctic refuge provision from the budget document. It is "foolish to say oil development and a wildlife refuge can coexist," she said.

Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites), D-Mass., argued that more oil would be saved if Congress enacted an energy policy focusing on conservation, more efficient cars and trucks and increased reliance on renewable fuels and expanded oil development in the deep-water Gulf where there are significant reserves.

"The fact is (drilling in ANWR) is going to be destructive," said Kerry.

But drilling proponents argued that modern drilling technology can safeguard the refuge and still tap the likely — though not yet certain — 10.4 billion barrels of crude in the refuge.

"Some people say we ought to conserve more. They say we ought to conserve instead of producing this oil," said Sen. Pete Domenici (news, bio, voting record), R-N.M., "But we need to do everything. We have to conserve and produce where we can."

The vote Wednesday contrasted with the last time the Senate took up the ANWR drilling issue two years ago. Then, an attempt to include it in the budget was defeated. But drilling supporters gained strength last November when Republicans picked up three additional seats, all senators who favored drilling in the refuge.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 109th; allow; anwr; arctic; bushhaters; cantvotewell; drilling; econute; energy; environment; lurch; radicalleftists; rats; senate; sorelosers; treehuggers; ussenate; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-387 next last
To: odoso

well...that would be 1mil barrels a month for 10,400 months...so what...866 years?


141 posted on 03/16/2005 11:46:13 AM PST by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I asked a lib once why he didn't peddle his butt the 20 mile round trip for work. Of course, I got no answer.


142 posted on 03/16/2005 11:46:32 AM PST by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
This photo is from the NRDC website, no bias there!



Alaska's musk oxen, wiped out by hunters in the late nineteenth century, were later reintroduced in the northern part of the state. Today, they number a few hundred on the Arctic Refuge coastal plain. According to the Interior Department, though, habitat destruction from oil-related activity in the refuge would reduce their numbers by 25 percent to 50 percent.

http://www.nrdc.org/land/wilderness/arctic/1.html

143 posted on 03/16/2005 11:46:39 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odoso
How much of a supply would 10.4 billion barrels equal?

It is not that much. I have heard 2.5%-5% of our total use. That is a lot, yes, but not enough to get ous off the Saudi's teat.

144 posted on 03/16/2005 11:46:43 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
AFIK, there are no bison in Alaska.

Well there was a herd of them near Delta Junction when I was up there ( Fort Greely)in 1970 for Artic Testing
145 posted on 03/16/2005 11:46:53 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix

Yeah, not to mention Walter Cronkite.


146 posted on 03/16/2005 11:47:36 AM PST by smoothsailing (Eagles Up !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

Comment #147 Removed by Moderator

To: KurtAZ

oh sorry...days...uhm...28 years at 1mil barrels a day.


148 posted on 03/16/2005 11:47:56 AM PST by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
they look like water buffaloes

Everybody's got a water buffalo
Yours is fast but mine is slow
Oh everybody's got a water buffalo-oooooo

< /veggie tales silly songs with larry mode>

149 posted on 03/16/2005 11:47:58 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
No, that is likely an accurate photo.

No, its not.

The area they want to drill in, is a frozen tundra, that pic is not a frozen tundra.

150 posted on 03/16/2005 11:48:00 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

I guess I just need to remember the more things change, the more they stay the same. Thanks.


151 posted on 03/16/2005 11:48:05 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

something about the diffusion of responsibility. He'll cry all day about it, but ask him to put his money where his mouth is?...that mouth will shut tighter than a duck's butt.


152 posted on 03/16/2005 11:48:30 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

you must have been referring to the eskimo insurgent controlled Anwar province in the volatile western quadrant of Al-Asqa.


153 posted on 03/16/2005 11:48:42 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
My thought too.... buffalo in ANWR? I thought there were only caribou.

See my above reply
154 posted on 03/16/2005 11:48:56 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Thank God!

I don't know what else to say but thanks be to God. It's about time we start using our natural resources instead of relying on foreigners to support us.


155 posted on 03/16/2005 11:49:06 AM PST by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Took my buffalo to the store
got his head stuck in the door

STOP STOP STOP! EVERYONE DOES NOT HAVE A WATERBUFFALO! We'll get letters asking "why don't I have a waterbuffalo" and "Where's my waterbuffalo?"


156 posted on 03/16/2005 11:49:39 AM PST by KurtAZ (So they've got us surrounded, good! Now we can fire in any direction, those bastards won't get away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Musk ox.


157 posted on 03/16/2005 11:49:42 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: odoso

http://www.anwr.org/archives/how_long_would_your_state_run_on_anwr_oil.php

How Long Would Your State Run on ANWR Oil?
Based on mean United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimates of oil potential in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) (10.4 billion barrels*) and petroleum consumption for each state using statistics provided by the Energy Information Agency (EIA), the U.S. Department of the Interior calculated the number of years that ANWR oil would power each state.

http://www.anwr.org/archives/ANWRHowLong.pdf

State Number of Years ANWR Oil Would Supply State

Alabama 103 Missouri 77
Alaska 203 Montana 342
Arizona 108 Nebraska 255
Arkansas 146 Nevada 226
California 16 New Hampshire 315
Colorado 120 New Jersey 46
Connecticut 132 New Mexico 222
Delaware 399 New York 34
District of Columbia 1,710 North Carolina 58
Florida 29 North Dakota 399
Georgia 54 Ohio 43
Hawaii 249 Oklahoma 97
Idaho 363 Oregon 155
Illinois 43 Pennsylvania 39
Indiana 68 Rhode Island 570
Iowa 132 South Carolina 120
Kansas 141 South Dakota 499
Kentucky 79 Tennessee 80
Louisiana 36 Texas 9
Maine 249 Utah 218
Maryland 100 Vermont 598
Massachusetts 75 Virginia 62
Michigan 52 Washington 68
Minnesota 84 West Virginia 266
Mississippi 116 Wisconsin 83
Wyoming 374


158 posted on 03/16/2005 11:49:46 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sax

They taste very gamey...
Cows are better.


159 posted on 03/16/2005 11:50:32 AM PST by Combat Override Button
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP; Gipper08; jmc813; dennisw; SJackson; TrueBeliever9; Geist Krieger; JohnHuang2; Salem; ..
MAJOR SHIFT IN ENERGY POLICY (FOR THE BETTER) - ping.

(This will send chills down the camels back in Saudi - it may even keep us out of future "Oil-ForFood" comedy scandals at the United Nations - hello Kofi.)

==================================

WASHINGTON - Amid the backdrop of soaring oil and gasoline prices, a sharply divided Senate on Wednesday voted to open the ecologically rich Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, delivering a major energy policy win for President Bush (news - web sites).

160 posted on 03/16/2005 11:50:33 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 381-387 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson