OK, quick lesson on our system. The court's rely on the opposing party to present the very worst evidence against their opposition which they can. In this instance, I suspect that if the parents had evidence that the husband was trying to kill his wife, they would have presented that evidence. [Maybe they did, I don't know.] One thing I know (knowing lawyers as I do), the parents' lawyers made the best arguments against the husband that they could -- and they weren't good enough to carry the day.
Moreover, we have lots of police and other investigatory agencies and lots of public prosecutors. If any of them thought they had a whiff of a case of attempted murder which would stand up in court, they would have pursued it.
Doesn't that give you just a little pause in making such allegations?
You keep forgetting (or maybe you don't know) how Greer ran his court. He refuses to view/see evidence on the side of the Schindlers. He's extremely prejudiced for the husband's side.
How do you KNOW they would have pursued it. I had read that when the Schindlers found out about Terri's bone scan, the brought it to the attention of the Sheriff. However, the Sheriff refused to investigate, supposedly because it was too old. They don't "HAVE" to pursue anything, and they sure as heck haven't! They all seem to be tied together; the judge, the lawyer, the hospice, the Sheriff's department; anyone that could help Terri. Check it out - it's all out there.