Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: winstonchurchill
"Moreover, we have lots of police and other investigatory agencies and lots of public prosecutors. If any of them thought they had a whiff of a case of attempted murder which would stand up in court, they would have pursued it."

How do you KNOW they would have pursued it. I had read that when the Schindlers found out about Terri's bone scan, the brought it to the attention of the Sheriff. However, the Sheriff refused to investigate, supposedly because it was too old. They don't "HAVE" to pursue anything, and they sure as heck haven't! They all seem to be tied together; the judge, the lawyer, the hospice, the Sheriff's department; anyone that could help Terri. Check it out - it's all out there.

676 posted on 03/17/2005 12:30:53 PM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies ]


To: jackibutterfly
How do you KNOW they would have pursued it. I had read that when the Schindlers found out about Terri's bone scan, the brought it to the attention of the Sheriff. However, the Sheriff refused to investigate, supposedly because it was too old. They don't "HAVE" to pursue anything, and they sure as heck haven't! They all seem to be tied together; the judge, the lawyer, the hospice, the Sheriff's department; anyone that could help Terri.

Well, as you know, there are such things as statutes of limitation. As I understand your view of the 1991 nuclear imaging report, it is that the report constitutes evidence of batteries upon Terry prior to her strokes. It is true that those would be barred by the statute of limitations.

By my comment was addressed to the contention that the husband was (currently) trying to 'murder' his wife. If true, that would be a crime and no statute of limitations would prevent a grand jury or prosecutor from investigating and charging it.

Now your last sentence reflects the 'conspiracy theory of history'. I'm sorry I just don't believe in such large conspiracies. My experience as a prosecutor was that any conspiracy involving more than two conspirators couldn't be maintained. BTW, what's their motive? Sharing in insurance proceeds? Come'on.

680 posted on 03/17/2005 12:51:09 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson