Posted on 03/16/2005 8:50:34 AM PST by traumer
U.S. Trade Deficit Hits All-Time High of $665.9 Billion in 2004, Commerce Dept. Reports
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The United States deficit in the broadest measure of international trade soared to an all-time high of $665.9 billion in 2004, showing in stark terms the speed with which the country is becoming indebted to the rest of the world.
The Commerce Department reported Wednesday that the shortfall in the current account was 25.5 percent higher than the previous record, the $530.7 billion deficit set in 2003. The department also noted that the deficit was worsening as the year ended with the shortfall in the fourth quarter hitting a record $187.9 billion, up 13.3 percent from the third quarter deficit.
The Bush administration contends the soaring trade deficits reflect a U.S. economy that is growing faster than the rest of the world, pushing up imports and dampening demand for U.S. exports. But private economists are worried that the huge level of resources being transferred into the hands of foreigners will eventually result in lower U.S. living standards.
Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve reported that output at the nation's factories, mines and utilities rose by 0.3 percent in February, following a tiny 0.1 percent increase in January. It was the best showing since a surge of 0.8 percent in December and was led by a 0.5 percent jump in manufacturing, the third straight 0.5 percent gain in this sector.
In other economic news, the Commerce Department said construction of new homes and apartments rose by 0.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 2.195 million units in February, the fastest pace in 21 years.
Construction of single-family homes hit an all-time high of 1.775 million units, up 0.3 percent from January, and multi-family construction was up 1.7 percent to 420,000 units.
Analysts believe the housing sector, which has set sales records for four straight years, will begin to cool this year under the impact of rising interest rates.
The current account trade deficit is closely watched by economists because it is the broadest measure of international trade, covering not only trade in goods but also trade in services and investment flows between nations. The deficit for 2004 was not only a record in dollar terms but also as a percentage of the total U.S. economy, climbing to 5.7 percent of the gross domestic product, up from 4.8 percent of GDP in 2003.
The deficit represents the amount in resources that the United States is transferring into the hands of foreigners in exchange for foreign oil, cars and other products that Americans are purchasing.
While foreigners have been more than willing to exchange their products for U.S. dollars, there is a worry that at some point they will become less willing to do so and will seek to exchange dollars for other foreign currencies.
The dollar's value against other currencies has been declining for three years but so far that decline has been orderly.
However, some private analysts worry that one day the dollar might begin falling in value more sharply if foreigners suddenly decide to diversify into other currencies and begin cashing in their holdings of U.S. stocks, bonds and Treasury securities. Such a development could send stock prices in this country plunging and interest rates surging.
Investor Warren Buffett warned in this year's letter to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. that the United States could become a "sharecropper's society" by the continued transfer of U.S. assets into foreign hands. He estimated the country's debt to foreigners could surge to $11 trillion by 2015.
However, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has said in recent speeches that he believes the country's current account deficit will be resolved without sparking financial market turmoil as the weaker dollar makes U.S. goods more competitive in foreign countries while making imports more expensive and thus less appealing to Americans.
But Buffett warned in his letter to shareholders that the growing indebtedness would require annual payments to foreigners to service the debt of around $550 billion by 2015, a transfer of resources that would mean less investment and lower living standards in the United States.
For 2004, the current account deficit reflected a shortfall of $665.5 billion in goods, up from a goods deficit of $547.6 billion in 2003. One-fourth of the deterioration was blamed on higher foreign oil imports.
The U.S. surplus in services shrank to $48.4 billion last year, down from a surplus of $51 billion in 2003. U.S. investors earned $24.1 billion in their foreign holdings last year while foreign investors earned a higher $33.3 billion on their holdings in the United States. Unilateral transfers, including such things as foreign aid, totaled $72.9 billion in 2004, up from $67.4 billion in 2003.
Warren Buffet = chicken little
here we go again...
Never mind the trade deficit has been going up for over 20 years and no news was mentioned about the trade deficit during the 90's even though it was still going up.
It's time to cut the pork coming out of congress.
He's full of *_it.
"It's time to cut the pork coming out of congress."
Don't count on it under this Admin.
"Warren Buffett warned... the United States could become a "sharecropper's society" by the continued transfer of U.S. assets into foreign hands "
HA ! Could ?
IMO the low dollar will bring a very busy tourist season and a growing demand for American products.
Another reason not to support drilling ANWR?
All those overseas dollars will be spent on a military hardware (probably from Europe....)
The French must not be allowed to sell arms to China.
If we want China to have less money, we should stop buying from China. FTAA now!!!
So, our economy must be 25.5% smaller than last year. Or is it 13.3% smaller?
Wait, you mean GDP grew 4.4% last year? Never mind!!
It's always time to do that, but that is unrelated to the trade deficit.
Question: would you rather have it the other way around?
Capital account transactions were net outflows of $0.4 billion in the fourth quarter, virtually unchanged from the third. (source)
Thats the number that really matters, the GDP growth. Well and compared to population growth, so we know its real standard of living.
The MSM is desperately trying to find any measure that can be viewed at in a negative way. Such as a rising Euro, or rising trade deficit.
Even a lot of people who know the MSM's bias, are getting sucked in by the economic fear mongering.
And a lot of people on FR who should know better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.