[Smartaleck]

While the intentions are "good" and noble this is another affront to states rights.

Just as the Supreme Court trampled on the states and the death penalty recently...

[Drango]

this is another affront to states rights.

And personal(family) rights. The bill would subject families' most sensitive and personal end-of-life decisions to control by government edict. No thanks.

[DManA]

Not to mention due process. this is another affront to states rights.

[penowa]

"While the intentions are 'good' and noble this is another affront to states rights."

This woman's civil rights are being denied by a crooked judge in a backward county with not even an audit of guardianship practices (as ordered by the legislature.) If this isn't a case that should be in a federal court, then you should feel free to use the Bill of Rights for toilet paper.

[nmh]

"While the intentions are "good" and noble this is another affront to states rights. "

"Just as the Supreme Court trampled on the states and the death penalty recently..."

Maybe you haven't noticed but this is a STATE WIDE problem. We do need FEDERAL intervention because states have ABUSED their authority. Call it a check and balance.

[RightWhale]

A Bill in relief of one person is hardly a challenge to states' rights.