Skip to comments.
Battling the Clintons, and Each Other (Judicial Watch may tie up Peter F. Paul)
NY Times ^
| 3/15/05
| IAN URBINA
Posted on 03/16/2005 4:47:57 AM PST by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: krucader_bravepages_com
Is this the Corridor of Death?
21
posted on
06/18/2005 1:49:11 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: Libloather
Mr. Fitton rejected Mr. Paul's account. "Peter hasn't the slightest idea about our how we fund-raise or what money we have made," he said.
"We actually have lost money on his case." ==================================================
Lost money on the case? Now that is humorous.
22
posted on
06/18/2005 1:57:32 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
To: krucader_bravepages_com; doug from upland
Mr. Paul -
Thanks for your response. Since you have stood up and replied directly, and since I've found some information that independently corroborates your description of Brazil extradition process, and since DFU is vouching for you, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.
I do have a question - How does the superceding indictment square against Article XXI of the U.S.-Brazil Extradition Treaty of 1961? Are you considered "at liberty" now, and were you given the 30-day notification?
23
posted on
06/18/2005 10:45:54 PM PDT
by
HAL9000
(Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson