I don't know, but there are always folks who, through ignorance, remain non-believers of what has been repeatedly demonstrated, both in practice and through theoretical analysis -- the fact that evolutionary processes can produce vast amounts of complexity and results that are so elegant that they look as if they were the work of a clever engineer, even though they're not.
Even so, many people remain ignorant of this fact and continue to naively believe that only intelligent planning can produce complexity and intricate processes.
"Even so, many people remain ignorant of this fact and continue to naively believe that only intelligent planning can produce complexity and intricate processes"
Can only chance occurance and natural selection produce complexity and intricate processes?
It's a two-way street. Why should one be supported over the other if both are POSSIBLE? (We can ignore probability for the sake of this particular discussion due to the lack of a statistic provided for creationism)