Skip to comments.
Killings spark rethinking about concealed weapons
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^
| 03/15/2005
| Sylvester Brown Jr.
Posted on 03/15/2005 12:45:04 PM PST by jdege
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
03/15/2005 12:45:05 PM PST
by
jdege
To: jdege
I am 59 years old. It won't happen in Illinois in my life time.
2
posted on
03/15/2005 12:48:40 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: jdege
The ones who are going to do the shooting anyway will get a gun or guns. What the laws do is keep law abiding citizens from carrying.
3
posted on
03/15/2005 12:50:49 PM PST
by
eyespysomething
(Vous pouvez vous rendre au garde de securite!)
To: jdege
That concept, however, leads me to a bigger concern. How do we know who's ordinary and who's capable of mayhem? We don't, moron, which is exactly the point.
Actually, though, we do have a pretty good idea of who is capable of mayhem based on their past convictions and incarcerations.
But then that would be racial profiling.
4
posted on
03/15/2005 12:52:54 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: jdege
I am considering long-term self-defence instruction for my family. The police come after the gun is dropped. Some people in the martial arts suggest jujitsu for the family. Anyone know a better art that can disable perps, even well-armed perps without an ounce of sanity?
5
posted on
03/15/2005 12:53:35 PM PST
by
sully777
(It's like my momma always said, "Two wrongs don't make a right but two Wrights make an airplane.")
To: sully777
6
posted on
03/15/2005 12:57:14 PM PST
by
Gilbo_3
(Patience is a virtue, but it aint one of mine !!!)
To: sully777
YES... Do not take martial arts to a gun fight, take a gun.
7
posted on
03/15/2005 12:57:59 PM PST
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: sully777
8
posted on
03/15/2005 12:58:53 PM PST
by
jdege
To: sully777
Anyone know a better art that can disable perps, even well-armed perps without an ounce of sanity? Target Practice and readiness, i'd consider both to an art.
9
posted on
03/15/2005 12:59:15 PM PST
by
BostonianRightist
(I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
To: Gilbo_3
Shotguns ???
Geat idea for short-range stopping power, though slightly messy.
I'm just guessing here, if I take a shotgun to a church meeting, or a courthouse, or wherever conceal and carry is not allowed, they may think I'm the problem not the solution. And I think the TSA requirements tell me I can't carry them on planes.
I was thinking more a physical martial art than a mechanical martial art.
10
posted on
03/15/2005 1:03:14 PM PST
by
sully777
(It's like my momma always said, "Two wrongs don't make a right but two Wrights make an airplane.")
To: sully777
I find the Mossberg 590 loaded with 00 Buckshot to be very artistic in a "form follows function" way.
To: sully777
Anyone know a better art that can disable perps, even well-armed perps without an ounce of sanity?Moy Yat Ving Tsun is the most direct "hard" art there is. There's not much pretty about it, but it gets the job done and helps to keep you off the ground (grappling). More experienced practitioners will learn some emergency grappling techniques in Third Form.
Do not confuse with Wing Chun, aka "Water Closet" Ving Tsun. Check out a class sometime. If the folks are relaxed in their training it is VT. If you see a lot of slapping it's WC.
Ving Tsun is great for familes because most of the training requires a partner. And there's lots of training excercises a big man can do with a little girl. It's also cool because in the beginning form there's little moving around so the kids can train in the house without breaking stuff. The biggest benefit of all is learning how to really relax.
For more info see www.moyyat.com
Look for the Moy Yat seal:
12
posted on
03/15/2005 1:06:40 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: jdege
The "ordinary guy" profile fits quite a few people who suddenly snap and start shooting people. ...then I, if not dead or dying, will draw my pistol and return fire(doubletap & headshot), dumb ass(the author).
13
posted on
03/15/2005 1:07:01 PM PST
by
Studebaker Hawk
(I've heard that geeks are a dime- a -dozen.I'm looking for the man with the dimes. FB)
To: jdege
How do we know who's ordinary and who's capable of mayhem? You don't.
You assume everyone is nuts, armed, and ready to snap at the drop of a hat.
If you plan accordingly, you can calmly deal with the situation if it arises.
If you do not plan accordingly, you cannot deal with the situation if it arises.
Boy Scout motto: Be Prepared.
To: jdege
Get a grip Sylvester!
The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security!
15
posted on
03/15/2005 1:09:31 PM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: jdege
*without reading the rest of the thread first....*
How do we know who's ordinary and who's capable of mayhem?
You don't. That is the Number One reason to at all times be armed. Those who are intent on mayhem, will do so no matter what laws are passed. Carrying arms isn't one of those things you HOPE to use at some point. But they are the only thing that will give you a fighting chance if you DO end up in a bad situation.
16
posted on
03/15/2005 1:11:29 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(Sooner or later, you have to stand your ground. Whether anyone else does or not. - Michael Badnarik)
To: jdege
When I was an attorney in general practice handling a lot of divorce cases I bought a nice small pistol and got a conceal and carry license. Mainly I just kept it in my desk because I was kind of afraid to carry it, thinking I might shoot my ying yang off, and besides, I couldn't carry it to court or to the jail and I was afraid I'd forget someday and carry it somewhere where I wasn't supposed to have it. Now I only do only criminal defense and I feel like I have absolutely no need to carry the thing or even have it around. Deranged ex or soon to be ex spouses in divorce/custody/visitation type cases are much more of a threat than my criminal clients. I would imagine judges and prosecutors feel a little differently.
We've had conceal and carry laws in my state for several years now and I can't think of a single case where someone with such a license got in trouble for shooting someone who didn't need shooting. I imagine someone probably has, but my guess is that a very low percentage of those with such a license get in trouble for inappropriate gun play. I wonder if there are any reliable statistics on this.
17
posted on
03/15/2005 1:18:26 PM PST
by
TKDietz
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: sully777
I have found that even my basic knowledge of Aikido and Taekwondo have proven very worthwhile on several notable occasions.
19
posted on
03/15/2005 1:21:33 PM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: jdege
I have a coworker here at my job who says "I would rather women get raped than risk getting shot by their gun" I kid you not.
20
posted on
03/15/2005 1:22:10 PM PST
by
smith288
(The GOP, Ditech of politics... "lost another one to GOP" - Howard dean)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson