Did you read what you wrote? Did you read what I wrote? My comment is dead on --- they want equivalence. If it were the exact opposite, they would want tolerance, not equivalence. That is the exact opposite. Who taught you to frame an argument?
Gays want to be recognized having a marriage being the moral equivalent of a male and female. Sorry, it is not. I am not misinforming anybody. If gays want insurance together, a policy is available.
It is amazing when people "want" something just to satisfy themselves. Society and what is best for the propagation of the species be damned. There is going to be someone, as I said earlier, who is going to demand the right to marry a barnyard friend. Why can't he do that? Once you change the definition of an institution that has stood the test of time for centuries, that institution will be on a downward spiral.
It is the death of our civilization when a gay couple will get affirmative action for the adoption of children. It is beyond idiotic to think that children do not benefit from having a mom and a dad. I have heard the argument that it doesn't make any difference. That is unbelievable.
Ha ha, so sorry! I did read your sentence exactly WRONG! As you point out. So, no need to argue back against me. I do apologize for being so annoying.
As for your later point about mom and dad, that is an assertion that would make a good working hypothesis, but it is not clear that any two parents won't be able to reach the same measurable objectives.
Now I hope I read that right! :)