Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

Ha ha, so sorry! I did read your sentence exactly WRONG! As you point out. So, no need to argue back against me. I do apologize for being so annoying.

As for your later point about mom and dad, that is an assertion that would make a good working hypothesis, but it is not clear that any two parents won't be able to reach the same measurable objectives.

Now I hope I read that right! :)


395 posted on 03/15/2005 6:04:14 AM PST by Rambler7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]


To: Rambler7

It is only an assertion that it is better to have a mom and dad? Sorry, you are what is wrong with America, my friend. That ideas is so foolish as to almost appear to be a Saturday Night Live skit. Why not a mom and a dog who really loves and protects the child? Men and women bring different things to a child that two people of the same sex can never bring.


399 posted on 03/15/2005 6:37:46 AM PST by doug from upland (Coming soon -- YOU'VE BEEN FREEPED, Vol. 1.; Biden and Kennedy won't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson