Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OhioAttorney
And neither you nor 'most Americans' need to alter your opinion one whit, under this ruling or under any other that I would approve. If you don't approve of same-sex marriages, don't recognize them. Just don't make it legally impossible for anyone to recognize them.

Marriage is an institution that doesn't discriminate. If Mr A is hetero and Mr B is homo, neither can marry Mr C, no matter his proclivities. To claim that discriminates against Mr. B is ludicrous on it's face.

What's more, any legislation limiting the newspeak meaning of marriage to homosexuals would be discriminatory.

234 posted on 03/14/2005 4:19:40 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

So gay "Mr. B" can't marry gay "Mr. C", but it is OK for him to marry gay "Ms. D"? A lot of homosexuals are in marriages of convenience. They do so to get the benefits that a heterosexual person can or to hide their proclivities from others. I find that more repugnant than two homosexuals in a committed relationship. Shouldn't society promote stable, loving families? Doesn't that benefit us all?


240 posted on 03/14/2005 4:29:48 PM PST by SilentServiceCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson