Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

So gay "Mr. B" can't marry gay "Mr. C", but it is OK for him to marry gay "Ms. D"? A lot of homosexuals are in marriages of convenience. They do so to get the benefits that a heterosexual person can or to hide their proclivities from others. I find that more repugnant than two homosexuals in a committed relationship. Shouldn't society promote stable, loving families? Doesn't that benefit us all?


240 posted on 03/14/2005 4:29:48 PM PST by SilentServiceCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: SilentServiceCPO
So gay "Mr. B" can't marry gay "Mr. C", but it is OK for him to marry gay "Ms. D"?

That's correct, the law doesn't discriminate based on what you do or don't do with your genitals.

A lot of homosexuals are in marriages of convenience. They do so to get the benefits that a heterosexual person can or to hide their proclivities from others. I find that more repugnant than two homosexuals in a committed relationship.

So what? You get a majority of people in your state to agree with you and you can assuage your problem of finding something repugnant.

Shouldn't society promote stable, loving families?

Society does promote stable, loving families and the institution they have chosen to do that with is heterosexual marraige.

Doesn't that benefit us all?

Heterosexual marriage? Yes, all the data suggests that children benefit most when raised by Mom and Dad.

244 posted on 03/14/2005 4:35:47 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson