Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bush2000
"what would happen is that they would take whatever informatiion that they glean from the Win9x sources, and they would put it into making Wine more compatible with Windows. So, what would that accomplish?"

A simple license agreement would stop Wine from having Win9x, if MicroSoft wanted to bar Linux rather than coopt it like the Borg.

What would releasing Win95 into open source accomplish for MicroSoft? It would give MicroSoft more desktops to sell MS Office and Age of Empires.

Right now, sole source proprietary hardward vendors like TiVo are limited to Linux or some flavors of Unix (ha, redundant statement) to ship a "free" OS with their DVR's.

Give them Win95 and then they can ship something that MicroSoft can charge for downloading games to.

So the plus side of releasing Win95, for MicroSoft, is that it will enlarge MicroSoft's market penetration.

The downside for MS not releasing Win95 is that MS constantly runs the risk that someone big such as Sony or Apple will figure out how to coopt the existing Linux marketspace, e.g. by either buying TiVo or by porting their games and applications to Linux...either of which would give Apple or Sony millions of new desktops to sell new software.

Does MicroSoft want to be the dominant home-tv-computer/business server vendor, or will MS delay long enough for another player to grab those markets?

198 posted on 03/15/2005 10:07:27 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
A simple license agreement would stop Wine from having Win9x, if MicroSoft wanted to bar Linux rather than coopt it like the Borg.

It isn't the Windows code that's valuable to Wine developers (they insist it's crap, anyway) -- it's the information contained inside: the specific behaviors, kludges, and data structures that Windows uses to make Windows apps function properly. Wine devs would rewrite any code that they got their hands on, and insist that it was clean-room-developed -- and it would strengthen their platform, while giving nothing back to MS. You don't have to believe me, but that is precisely what would happen. It wouldn't resurrect Win9x and get developers to suddenly start writing old-school Win9x apps. No way.
222 posted on 03/16/2005 1:11:37 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson