Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
I didn't say all the code went over without change. However, as far as setting try-catch blocks, how tough is it to look for an on-error goto and change it to a try-catch if you wrote it right to begin with? More importantly, VB6 and VB.NET are different animals. NET is fully OOP-compliant while VB6 isn't, so why would you not expect some editing? I agree, if you don't intend to take advantages of the enhancements to the language, especially the web stuff, just stay where you are.
193 posted on 03/15/2005 8:19:09 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: econjack
"More importantly, VB6 and VB.NET are different animals. NET is fully OOP-compliant while VB6 isn't, so why would you not expect some editing?"

That's been my point all along. VB.Net is *not* an enhanced VB 6; VB.Net is a different beast altogether, trading off of VB's name and reputation.

...And it isn't just "some editing," the software *architectures* between those two languages are different. So you aren't just talking about "some editing" of code, but of fundamental *design* changes...something that should be dealt with prior to coding for OO systems, not put together after the fact as migrating exisitng VB 6 projects over to VB.Net demands.

...Unless you want a lousy Object-Oriented system, of course. In which case, who cares about design or class exercising?!

195 posted on 03/15/2005 9:37:40 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson