Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack
"As to backward compatibility with VB 6.0, Microsoft did the right thing when it broke it..."

Would C++ programmers embrace a new C++ engine that couldn't compile old C++ code??

Because that's what MicroSoft did with VB.Net, it won't run code from any of the earlier versions of VB.

How would Java programmers react to a new Java engine that couldn't run old Java code?

...And you think that's the right thing?! You must be young and in no position of corporate or financial responsibility.

107 posted on 03/14/2005 12:11:42 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Southack

Hmmm...So when the automobile came into being and the buggies were no longer compatible, you're saying everyone should still be driving around in horse-drawn buggies? If you write ANSI C++ code, it should still compile. If you didn't, that's hardly ANSI's problem.

As to slamming me and my credentials, I was the founder and CEO of a software company that produced compilers and other programming tools for 17 years and am teaching in the computer technology department of a Big Ten university. Before you run off at the mouth next time, you might want to click on the person's name first to see if they have any depth to them. I did so with yours and have a pretty good idea of how you spend your time...I'll stack my credentials against yours any day of the week.


113 posted on 03/14/2005 12:54:01 PM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson