Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 03/12/2005 4:43:56 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: MadIvan

You know, I admire and respect Dr. Rice...but she's been on the job THREE MONTHS! Let the woman prove herself to us, already!

More proof that America has the attention span of a gnat. And that is NOT a Good Thing, Martha! ;)

Those amongst us with actual, working BRAINS have a wonderful, goal-oriented, kick-butt and take no prisoners sitting PRESIDENT, and we act as if he's already yesterday's fish wrap. Aarrgghh!


42 posted on 03/12/2005 5:57:51 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

The insidious Democrat and RINO media campaign for a Republican nomination of Rice, McCain, Giuliani and others like them is nothing more or less than an attempt to drive away the majority Republican voter base. It's an effort for nothing but surely putting Hillary Clinton in office as our next president.

It's the most anti-conservative, anti-American media move possible for now. And all who hate America the most are frothing at their fascist lips to see Hillary as the next US President. It's the trash-America dream of every anti-American person on this planet.

No, thanks. We will elect even more of a great, "neo-conservative" "warmongering cowboy" as our next president. And to heck with anyone who desires otherwise, IMO.


44 posted on 03/12/2005 6:06:22 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Rice is a good diplomat. But the more leftist pushing we see to elect her or another libertine conservative (oxymoronic phrase) to be our president, the more likely we will be to elect one of our Republican generals to spite all who hate our country.


47 posted on 03/12/2005 6:08:20 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

bump


53 posted on 03/12/2005 6:14:17 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Mildly pro-choice won't cut it with me, unless she explains that she means the "choice" is ONLY in cases of rape, incest, and life of the mother.

That is actually a "mildly pro-life" position.


54 posted on 03/12/2005 6:24:21 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

We've already had a huge Condi thread, but I'm afraid I feel obliged to say again that her announcing in the context of running for the presidency that she is "moderately pro-choice" simply disqualifies her. Period.

It's not my opinion. Running someone who favors abortions would turn off millions of Evangelical, Catholic, Hispanic, and working-class voters who came out for Bush in the last two elections, and also turn off many of the most energetic volunteers. Unless she does a quick repair job, she has just sunk her candidacy.


55 posted on 03/12/2005 6:26:37 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
But she emphasised that abortion should be “as rare a circumstance as possible”.

So did the Clinton's, "safe rare an legal."

59 posted on 03/12/2005 6:41:13 PM PST by itsahoot (There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

What don't people understand?

"When the subject was first broached by the Washington Times reporter, Rice replied with a brush-off. “I never wanted to run for anything,” she said. “I have enormous respect for people who do run for office. It’s really hard for me to imagine myself in that role.”

She was pressed on whether she was prepared to repeat the famous denial of General William T Sherman, who said in 1884: “If nominated, I will not run; if elected I will not serve.”

Rice replied with a chuckle: “That’s not fair . . . I really can’t imagine it.”


64 posted on 03/12/2005 6:51:07 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Be wary of the "Move On " FReepers. They want to give Hanoi Kerry a free pass? mmmm WHY?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Condi is Hillary's worst nightmare presidential race speaking..

Condi is no moonbat.. Hillary is a veritable vampire..
If the republicans could field Any electable man that had even just ONE BALL, I would go that way.. they cannot.. Looks like its Condi.. -or- the final morphing of this republic into a primitive democracy, like Canada.. That is if Condi can develop some FANGS.. cause the Hildebeast is indeed a beast.. and will fight behind the scenes with ALL the help the MSM and MSP and Academia can muster.. and Oh!,, the Fags, Hollywood, Oprah, Dr. Phil, the talk shows, all the wrestling fans.. and the Jerry Springer audience.. and any other ditzy WOMEN not mentioned yet..

Condi will NEED Ann Coulter on her campaign team.. and Laura Ingraham too..

65 posted on 03/12/2005 6:52:17 PM PST by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Condi better back off the pro-abortion statements and commit 100% to the Republican Party Platform on the abortion issue or she will lose. Period. She may be "pro-choice" but she needs to shut up about it and start demonstrating a total commitment to the platform.
70 posted on 03/12/2005 7:25:45 PM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

77 posted on 03/12/2005 9:35:11 PM PST by nutmeg (democRATs = The Party of NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

If Condi wants the nomination she'd better get staunchly prolife and fast.


78 posted on 03/12/2005 9:37:21 PM PST by lawgirl (Please support me as I walk 60 miles in 3 days to support breast cancer research! (see my profile!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Rice admitted to being “mildly pro-choice”

Does being mildly pro-choice mean that an aborted baby is mildly dead?

Admitted? All she admitted to is that she's a weanie.

84 posted on 03/12/2005 10:30:11 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

So if Democrats vote for hillary instead of Condi ...wouldnt that make them racists?


86 posted on 03/12/2005 10:43:47 PM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

Condi wouldn't win one primary and Hillary will never be President.


87 posted on 03/12/2005 11:36:15 PM PST by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
WASHINGTON is suddenly agog at the prospect of President Condi.

Best check in with the Red States. Washington is agog about anything from centerline to extreme left.

89 posted on 03/13/2005 4:32:48 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

If Condi plays a big role in a successful Middle East peace policy/taming Iran/NK, she'll have put to bed that 'never held elective office' worry. Only V.P. Cheney has more stature and experience, but he doesn't want to run.


95 posted on 03/13/2005 6:55:45 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan

She's never run a family, has she?
If not, then she doesn't have a clue.


100 posted on 03/13/2005 8:22:17 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Not going to happen. Lets be real here. Do Americans really want Hillary the lesbian ( or whatever she is) sleezy ex lawyer socialist as president.

Condi is smart but does not have all the components to be prez. For one she is single and has never really governed.

There may be back room deals being made but I don't think the American public are going to buy a woman as prez at this time.

114 posted on 03/13/2005 9:32:37 AM PST by jetson (throne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
Qualifications:

Black, woman, Republican (in your liberal face, unique)

White, woman, liberal, former first lady.

If Rice is the best the party can do, or if those two are the best we can hope for, we're in big trouble.

117 posted on 03/13/2005 9:40:04 AM PST by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90 T6 AWD....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson