UN says Sudan death toll much higher than 70,000

The Taipei Times ^ | 3/11/06

[bloggodocio]

Bloggodocio

AP , UNITED NATIONS Friday, Mar 11, 2005 Far more people have died in Sudan's ravaged Darfur region than the 70,000 reported since last year, and many of those deaths were from preventable causes like pneumonia and diarrhea, the UN humanitarian chief said Wednesday.

Getting an accurate count of the dead from Darfur's two-year conflict has been extremely difficult because of the size and remoteness of much of the region. It is known that thousands have died from the fighting and many thousands more from disease or hunger.

Egeland said the 70,000 figure was released when there were 1 million internally displaced people in Darfur, but that number has now doubled to some 2 million. As the number of people who have fled increases, the number who die of malnutrition or a host of other reasons also goes up, he said.

"Is it three times that, is it five times that, I don't know, but it's several times the number of 70,000 that have died altogether," Egeland told reporters shortly after returning from a four-day trip to the region.

"The biggest killer has been systematical I think in Darfur -- diarrhea, pneumonia and many other preventable diseases," Egeland said.

The Darfur conflict began after two non-Arab rebel groups took up arms against the Arab-dominated government in February 2003 to win more political and economic rights for the region's African tribes.

Sudan's government is accused of responding by backing the janjaweed militia in a campaign of wide-scale abuses, including rape and killings, against Sudanese of African origin. The government denies backing the janjaweed.

Egeland has repeatedly prodded international donors to contribute more money for Darfur and the rest of Sudan, which is only now recovering from a devastating civil war between the north and the south, separate from Darfur.

A peace agreement was signed last year ending the 21-year civil war, but will remain vulnerable unless more money is given, Egeland said.

"We were yearning for a generation for this peace agreement. The peace agreement comes and then some governments sit on the fence scratching their head and say, `What should we do now?'" Egeland said. This story has been viewed 133 times.

[rocksblues]

DUH! Who would of thunk it?

[bfree]

Another UN success story.

[aBootes]

No doubt. What we want to know is what the UN is going to do about it.

[Just A Nobody]

I believe your answer lies in the text, which said:

"Egeland has repeatedly prodded international donors to contribute more money for Darfur and the rest of Sudan, which is only now recovering from a devastating civil war between the north and the south, separate from Darfur."

There you have it, "Janice Egghead" wanting MORE money, again. At least he did not single out the US as stingy...yet.