Posted on 03/10/2005 1:59:03 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
The story is, by now, a familiar one: A female boxer from Missouri takes a terrible beating in the ring and winds up brain-damaged. She’s initially suicidal, but with the help of family and friends, she rallies, takes up painting, and speaks out about her life and the value of all life.
Wait a minute, you say: That’s not how Million Dollar Baby ends. In the Academy Award-winning film, the injured boxer begs her coach to kill her because she can’t face life as a quadriplegic, and he complies. But a real-life boxer, whose life story likely inspired the film, says the ending is bunk.
Like the boxer in Million Dollar Baby, Katie Dallam was a Missouri girl who grew up in poverty. In 1996, Katie began boxing. After just two months of training, her trainer urged her into a professional match and Katie stepped into the ring with a far more experienced boxer. By the end of four two-minute rounds, the referee stopped the fight, but it was too late. Katie had received 150 blows to the head and was comatose by the time she reached a hospital. Doctors told Katie’s sister that she “probably wouldn’t make it, and, if she did, would most likely be a vegetable.”
But Katie survived. She had to relearn how to walk and read. And her injuries affected her vision and memory. Deeply depressed, she attempted suicide. But instead of helping her sister kill herself, her sister, Stephanie, moved Katie into her home.
Unable to go back to her counseling job, Katie took up an earlier interest and began painting again.
Seeing Million Dollar Baby gave Katie nightmares. But it also led to her decision to talk with others about life after a devastating brain injury. As Katie told the New York Times, the fictional coach in Million Dollar Baby “took the easy way out by killing [the boxer] rather than having to deal with what her life would have been like.”
Katie’s sister, Stephanie, is convinced the film writer, F. X. Toole, now deceased, based the film on Katie. Too many similarities, she says. So Katie wants to set the record straight. People, you see, can live on after terrible injuries and live rich, productive lives—people like Joni Eareckson Tada, a quadriplegic who suffered a spinal-cord injury, who also paints and has a wonderful ministry.
As Joni and Friends journalist Sanda Allyson writes, “In the face of devastating injury, many people feel they want to die. But they move from depression and feeling that there is nothing for them” into a new hope and even joy.
“We can have peace and happiness,” she writes, “in the midst of situations that might have previously been thought of as unendurable. That is just one reason why virtually all disability advocacy groups . . . are so vehemently opposed to this idea of ‘helping’ someone die, which may sound warm and fuzzy, but in the searing light of truth, is just murder.”
So tell your neighbors that the real-life story behind Million Dollar Baby that exposes the Hollywood fiction and its values for what they are: propaganda. We can live life to the fullest, even with great disabilities, if we don’t fall for the secular siren song that says that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived.
The film Million Dollar Baby may have won Academy Awards, but the true-life story wins a much greater award for courage and human dignity.
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
It's not PROPOGANDA...It's just a one story. ONE STORY.
This was a good article. Could you put me on your ping list?
ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Interesting indeed! Not surprisingly, hollyweird twists the truth to fit their secularist liberal societal engineering agenda. Thanks to Colson, perhaps America will hear 'the rest of the story'.
You're added!
Clint sure didn't make anyone's day, it would have been no different if had used his Magnum.
This is just awful!
I think the "rags to riches through sports" scenario that's so common in entertainment is also very deceptive. It's more dramatic than "Go back to school, earn degree, get job, work, enjoy average middle-class life" - but it certainly encourages unrealistic expectations.
Not 'Hollywood fiction' but prose short stories fiction that was adapted by a screenwriter.
There is some debate whether the movie was propaganda, a debate I'm neutral in. But if it's established that this screenplay was based on Katie Dallam, then in my mind there's no way it wasn't propaganda, because they took an inspirational and dramatic story and purposefully twisted it into a whole different animal.
It was based on short stories by F.X. Otoole written some years ago. He has since died. Sorry no 'Hollyweird consipacy' here.
The movie doesn't present the outcome as something positive or happy. Most of the people calling it depraved haven't seen it.
Rope Burns, F.X. O'Toole
Hardcover: 237 pages
Publisher: Ecco (HarperCollins); 1st ed edition (September 1, 2000)
*****
2000 is "some years ago," true. But it's fewer years ago than the incident described by Charles Colson, so he could be correct that the actual events suggested the fiction plot.
Thanks for the reminder.
Could be. In the same way that the Chuck Wepner fight inspired Stallone's screenplay for Rocky. I was just refuting the tired 'Hollyweird conspiracy' drivel. Esepcially since no one wanted to make this movie and Eastwood had to get indie financing to get WB to chip in even a little.
"Conspiracy" is a pretty extreme claim. It's a dramatic story, obviously, and a well-made film, from what I understand. I will not see it, because I can't stand to watch boxing.
Clint Eastwood was looking like a death mask at the Oscars. I wonder if he's had a plastic surgery disaster, poor dear.
Sounds like you're purposely refuting some cliched complaint. But would you, or Clint more to the point, really have objected if the Academy had, for that night, created a brand new Joseph Goebbels Excellence in Film Awards, in honor of Goebbels' award winning film or films of the 1930s, and given the inaugural prize to Eastwood? There have to be remarkable parallels between Goebbels 'awfully moving' propaganda and that of Eastwood, in 2004/2005.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.