The Scientific realm has recently found that Second Hand Smoke Causes Breast Cancer
With crap like that being passed of as legitimate science, your appeal to science as a harbinger of "truth" is not likely to carry much weight.
If science is not a "harbinger of truth", then why do ID backers want to insist it IS a scientific theory? Can't have it both ways.
"With crap like that being passed of as legitimate science, your appeal to science as a harbinger of "truth" is not likely to carry much weight."
Sure, Science doesn't work. Forget Heart Transplants and Antibiotics. Cars and Telephones. 24 Hours of The Home Shopping Network watched on satellite by tribes in Swaziland.
Garbage, all of it.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say.