We have seen hundreds of instances of speciation, which is the scientific definition of macroevolution. We can infer thousands of instances from the fossils and DNA analysis of present forms.
Btw, micro and macro are the same process. Creationist crapsites lie about definitions.
Try not to post nonsense and I will treat you with more respect. Until you can get over the use on creationist sillyscience, you will have a rough time with me.
"Try not to post nonsense and I will treat you with more respect. Until you can get over the use on creationist sillyscience, you will have a rough time with me."
Yeah and me too! I'm a Professor of Hobbitt Creationism. Us intellectuals don't respond well to hooey and flapdoodle. Balderdash works sometimes, at faculty meetings...
Shouldn't the observed instances of speciation be fairly dramatic over recorded history to account for all the complexity, even if the earth is as old as the oldest old-earth estimate?
I'm asking you, since you sound so sure, what do you think, or how do you know, one way or the other? Ie persuade me, sans insults. (Or just point me to a link that answers the question persuasively)