Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware of Back-Door Gun Registration Scheme, Group Says
GOPUSA ^

Posted on 03/09/2005 6:07:17 AM PST by Happy2BMe

Beware of Back-Door Gun Registration Scheme, Group Says By Susan Jones CNSNews.com Morning Editor March 9, 2005

(CNSNews.com) -- Being on a terrorism watch list does not mean you really are a terrorist -- and therefore, your right to buy or own a gun should not be infringed, Second Amendment supporters say.

But FBI Director Robert Mueller, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and gun control groups disagree.

In testimony before Congress on Tuesday, Mueller said lawmakers "ought to look at what can be done" to prevent people on the government's terrorism watch list from buying guns.

His comments followed the release of a government report showing that more than 40 people included on a terrorism watch list were allowed to buy guns last year.

According to the audit by the Government Accountability Office, 35 people on the government's terrorist watch list legally bought guns in the United States between Feb. 3 and June 20, 2004. Twelve more people on the list were allowed to buy guns between July 1 and Oct. 31 of last year.

But none of those people had been charged with, or convicted of, any crime, said the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

By law, convicted felons, illegal aliens and people declared mentally ill are not allowed to buy guns. Being included on a terrorism watch list may invite more scrutiny, but it does not automatically disqualify someone from legally buying a gun.

"How does somebody's name get on one of those lists? How is it removed?" asked CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. The government does not discuss details of its terrorism watch list, which reportedly includes some 50,000 names.

But Sen. Frank Lautenberg believes anyone included on the government's terrorism watch list should be treated differently when it comes to gun purchases.

The New Jersey Democrat says he will introduce a bill requiring the National Instant Check System (NICS) to retain records of gun purchases by "watch-listed" people for at least ten years. Current law requires the FBI to destroy gun-purchase applications within 24 hours of approval.

But current law is "aiding and abetting terrorists," Lautenberg was quoted as saying on Tuesday. "Lots of times you can't uncover the data you need in 24 hours."

CCRKBA said Lautenberg is using the GAO report -- which he requested -- in an attempt to advance his gun control agenda.

"In Sen. Lautenberg's warped view, anyone who buys a gun is a suspected terrorist," said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. He believes Lautenberg is looking for a way to "justify a back-door gun registration scheme."

That way, if he ever gets his gun control bills through Congress, "he will know where to go to collect" all the guns, Gottlieb said.

According to CCRKBA, the GAO report shows that the NICS system works, but Sen. Lautenberg is trying to say it doesn't -- "so he can demand that we keep records on people who may have broken no laws."

CCRKBA said the American Civil Liberties Union would be in "hysterics" if Lautenberg's proposal to keep records on law-abiding Americans involved anything other than gun purchases.

CRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron said no system is completely fool-proof: "Even if we adopted all of the gun controls Frank Lautenberg has ever advocated, we would only disarm honest citizens, not criminals or potential terrorists, and he knows it."

According to USA Today, the terrorism watch list officially is known as the Violent Gang and Terrorist Organization File, and it includes everyone from actual terrorist suspects to their relatives, neighbors and co-workers.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: aclu; banglist; constitution; guncontrol; secondamendmendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: pageonetoo

Credit owed to Aldous Huxley, and Roger Waters...


21 posted on 03/09/2005 6:46:20 AM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Thanks for the ping!


22 posted on 03/09/2005 6:51:03 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wingnut1971

Even more to the point, are any of them pilots or have access to terrorist weapons like airplanes and Rider trucks? Shouldn't they be excluded from those activities before asking for their guns?


23 posted on 03/09/2005 6:51:14 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; OXENinFLA
Hi All-

"...This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow us into the future - Adolph Hitler, 1935..."


The statement attributed to Adolf Hitler is absolutely FALSE and was never made. Firearms enthusiasts must stop spreading this incorrect story. Why this fictional quote is seen over, and over, and over is beyond me.

The people who are really knowledgeable about this vile murderous maniac and his attitudes towards firearms can be visited at Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership for a complete and thorough background.

~ Blue Jays ~

24 posted on 03/09/2005 6:54:15 AM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays; OXENinFLA
OK, thanks.

However, the same precedent used in 1938 bears a striking resemblence to the one used in 2005.

It's still gun control that is not in favor of the private citizen and still will not prevent or delay terrorists from obtaining weapons.

25 posted on 03/09/2005 6:58:22 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Context is everything. Remember when Bill Clinton was president, Janet Reno was AG, Morris Dees and the SPLC were directing public policy and the NRA was considered by many in positions of power to be a "seditious" organization?

Remember when Rush Limbaugh was blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing? Remember when the term "patriot" was used by the left as a slur akin to "potential terrorist"?

This is a far more complicated issue than it may seem. A change in the political wind could put a lot of polifical dissenters of all stripes on the watch list.

26 posted on 03/09/2005 7:19:58 AM PST by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

bump


27 posted on 03/09/2005 7:22:27 AM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
Watch lists are as safe as the people who keep them.

Do you trust the government to do this? What is the government changes to a new regime you don't like. What then?

28 posted on 03/09/2005 7:30:44 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Thanks for the ping!

De Facto registration .......precisely why I don't have a carry permit. I find my grant of authority in the 2nd Amendment.


29 posted on 03/09/2005 7:38:17 AM PST by Conservative Goddess (Veritas vos Liberabit, in Vino, Veritas....QED, Vino vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
De Facto registration .......precisely why I don't have a carry permit. I find my grant of authority in the 2nd Amendment.

Well Said!

30 posted on 03/09/2005 7:44:12 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Exactly. The records are kept, so in effect we already have registration.


31 posted on 03/09/2005 8:32:31 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Did Hitler ban gun ownership?
....see below.
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mhitlergun.html


32 posted on 03/09/2005 8:46:55 AM PST by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Mueller said lawmakers "ought to look at what can be done" to prevent people on the government's terrorism watch list from buying guns

Well, if there's enough information that they are terrorists, they should be in jail, where they won't be buying any guns. If not, and they are citizens, then leave them the FReep alone, in full Passion of their rights. If they are foreigners, deport them, since that takes a whole lot less evidence than convicting someone in a court of law.

33 posted on 03/09/2005 9:09:57 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays; Happy2BMe; OXENinFLA; Smartaleck

Thanks for that info, on the false quote.
How about this one below, by Himmler; do you know if this is a verifiable and true quote?

"Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State." -–Heinrich Himmler


34 posted on 03/09/2005 9:17:24 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Here is what Hitler really said:

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so." (Adolph Hitler)


35 posted on 03/09/2005 9:24:21 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FBD; Blue Jays; Happy2BMe; OXENinFLA; Smartaleck
#34 and #35.

Thanks for clearing that up FBD. I don't need a link for it - I know they said (and did) it.

36 posted on 03/09/2005 10:12:42 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; FBD
We both know the government doesn't need to 'register' citizens to protect them.

If the government was serious about the protection of Americans from terrorism and foreign enemies, they would close the Mexican border.

37 posted on 03/09/2005 10:14:51 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FBD

I believe that quote is legit.


38 posted on 03/09/2005 10:43:21 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Hi All-

You're not kidding about our porous Mexican border...it's absolutely absurd down there. Who knows who is streaming across on a daily basis. My personal preference is to run two parallel fences along the border 400 meters apart. The ground between the two fences would be filled with landmines.

Large, illuminated, bright, reflective, black-on-yellow, multi-lingual signs could be placed at quarter-mile intervals:

*** ATTENTION / DANGER ***

You are approaching the border of the United States of America. The fenced area contains landmines which will result in death when triggered. For your safety, use authorized border crossing areas only.

We would still welcome properly-documented visitors, but they would need to cross at appropriate areas. Illegal aliens would only need to see two or three of their countrymen blown to smithereens before they got the point that the fenced territory must be honored. At the same time, the fences would prevent hikers, animals, and other innocents from accidentally being killed.

Use of this technique would drastically cut the costs associated with maintaining our southern border. Dangerous night patrols wouldn't be as critical since sensors could simply advise a central station that a fence had been crossed...then it is a matter of replacing the spent landmine. People would be fairly warned, so I think the number of lives saved (compared to casualties from starvation, thirst, bandits, etc.) would be greatly reduced. Just tell me if I'm being totally cold-hearted here.

~ Blue Jays ~

p.s. Sorry for the slight thread hijacking... Those foreign visitors coming to our country through the authorized points of entry should NOT be allowed to bring firearms either...unless they're specifically going on a hunting vacation or entering a shooting competition.

39 posted on 03/09/2005 11:18:36 AM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays
It's a mess. I just don't want the government to use the war on terrorism as a premise to rob Americans of their Second Amendment rights.

Much stranger things have happened.

(My tagline.)

40 posted on 03/09/2005 11:23:06 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Government is not the solution to our problem, government *IS* the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson