Posted on 03/08/2005 12:06:04 PM PST by r5boston
Nearly a decade ago, just a few months after Microsoft shipped Windows 95, I asked Bill Gates if it was a conscious decision in the development of that product to give Windows more of a Mac look and feel. Of course I knew he'd say it wasn't, but I couldn't resist asking. "There was no goal even to compete with Macintosh," Gates proclaimed. "We don't even think of Macintosh as a competitor."
That was a crock, so I pressed the issue a little. I asked him how he accounted for the widespread perception that Windows 95 looked a lot like Mac 88, and whether the similarity was just a coincidence. I didn't expect a sobbing confession of mimicry, but I thought it would be cool to see how he'd respond. Surprisingly enough, Gates shifted gears and became more forthcoming.
(Excerpt) Read more at macworld.com ...
LVD, on the iPod:
#144: ...the ipod is an expensive disposable toy - when the battery goes you get to throw it away...
#150: Make that $200+ to replace the hard-wired battery...
#150: ...if you have any WMV files you are SOL
ALL FALSE AT THE TIME THE STATEMENTS WERE MADE.
Okay, but you said that voiding the warranty by replacing the battery would somehow be bad. How?
Special case exceptions, and this isn't one.
Why do you keep repeating your errors?
ROM is an acronym for "Read-Only Memory"
Are PROM's Read-Only Memory? Yes.
Are EPROM's Read-Only Memory? Yes.
HINT: The ROM in PROM and EPROM means that same thing as ROM.
What you are attempting (and failing) to argue is the way ROM's and PROM's are implemented is different therefore the implementation of PROM's are not equal to the implementation of the ROM's but you are wrong since the acronym is in no way trying to address how the memory in implemented - only how it is used.
Spend a bit more time thinking and less time doing victory dances.
Says you!
The exception is for confusion. You are not the arbiter of what is confusing and what is not.
Which is confusing:
EEPROMS
or
EEPROM's
I have no idea what you are talking about. The warranty proves Apple designed the Ipod so the battery is not to be replaceable by the user. That was my point.
"EEPROM's" because it looks like you're trying for possessive. These terms have no lower case or puncuation, so there is no need for the apostrophe.
The least confusing form is EEPROMs.
What is that you say troll?
I have proved supporting evidence for each and every claim I have made. You have provided zippity-doo-dah - just troll snipes from the sidelines. You look like a complete fool when you yell in all caps the statements are false when there is supporting evidence for each and every statement just two messages back.
Your desperation is showing.
While Apple has change its policy many times, that does not change the validity of my statements or the reality of Apple 's Ipod design and strategy. Just because Apple changes their policy does not erase the fact the previous policy existed (this is not 1984)
The Ipod never supported and still does not support the WMV format. On that point you are - again - wrong.
Using your famous Petronski logic - when Saddam goes on trial all he has to say is "all the charges are false because at the current time I am not the ruler of Iraq"
Like you say all too often: LOL!
It might help your case if you provided some data to prove your assertions. As it stands, all that we're left with is a bunch of ALL-CAPS nonsense...
And I've already told you the lineage of the term in the later products, yet you still persist.
Are PROM's Read-Only Memory? Yes.
No. You can write, and the technology is different from that a ROM.
Are EPROM's Read-Only Memory? Yes.
No. You can write, and the technology is different from that a ROM.
HINT: The ROM in PROM and EPROM means that same thing as ROM.
HINT: The ROM in PROM and EPROM is an homage only to the ability of the original ROMs to hold data without current. Technically, "non-volatile solid-state memory." They used the term "ROM" to associate with the earlier technology although the newer products weren't ROMs. What resulted is a misnomer, although you know marketing, words don't always describe what an item really is. People tend to use "ROM" in casual usage for all types of non-volatile solid-state memory chips, but it's not factually true in in any case but actual masked ROMs.
It was all established earlier in this thread. The battery is not hard wired, one can buy a replacement for $30 and install it in a matter of minutes, the old one unplugs, the new one plugs in. You're well aware of this too. Those with non-DRM WMVs are not SOL, iTunes will convert them to AAC. It's a converted file, so there is some quality loss, but that is not SOL.
None of LSD's statements listed in my most recent two posts were true at the time he made them. They might have been true at some date prior to that, but most people would reference such a fact with past tense. He did not.
The business in all-caps is not nonsense, it's been demonstrated in this thread by me and others.
But I think that is your own personal confusion since:
CVS's
M.B.A.'s
are both valid - the apostrophe is sometimes used to show plural.
I am not that interested in picking the nit but you tried to insult me in relation to using "'s" to show plural in acronyms - you clearly did not understand that "'s" is sometimes used to show plural. Your attack was bogus, uncalled for, and lacked an understanding of the subject.
I do find it funny that you feel published word definitions need not be followed but published punctuation guidelines must be rigidly followed without any variation or deviation
Factually true. The iPod, being a music player, does not support the Windows Media Video format. But for this discussion I'll assume you meant Windows Media Audio (WMA).
However, your original assertion was "and if you have any WMV [WMA] files you are SOL." That is factually wrong since iTunes will convert your WMV files to a format the iPod can read when you import your current library and transfer the resulting files to your iPod. The iPod may not play WMA, but that doesn't make someone with a WMA library "SOL" as you stated.
No. You can write, and the technology is different from that a ROM.
You can not write to an EPROM within a computer. In a computer, an EPROM is Read-Only Memory. You are wrong.
What I like best is that it appears you've just been misusing apostrophes all this time, then when caught searched for a style guide to support your use. I don't think you've been using them thoughtfully and on purpose (which allows you to make exceptions for clarity) due to the other apostrophe misuse in your writing.
But you're right, it's (not "its") a tangent. We can end it.
Sheesh. He's got me repeating his mistakes. It's WMAs, not WMVs, obviously.
You state that as if it were a conscious value decision. The majority of computer users think "Windows" = "Computer" and "Explorer" = "World Wide Web." The terms are synonymous, so when they go to buy a computer, they buy Windows.
I remember when people saw my UNIX or Linux boxes, I'd often hear "But how can it work without Windows?" They had no concept that there were other operating systems out there. No wonder they don't buy them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.