Skip to comments.
Man Facing 26 Years for Lying Wins Hearing
Reuters ^
| 3-7-2005
Posted on 03/07/2005 8:12:52 AM PST by Cagey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
1
posted on
03/07/2005 8:12:52 AM PST
by
Cagey
To: Cagey
Rules are rules, and in America - That doesn't mean squat anymore! Why have them at all? >Sarcasm<
2
posted on
03/07/2005 8:16:45 AM PST
by
odoso
(Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
To: Cagey
He knew full well that he was subject to the three-strikes provisions, yet he chose to offend for a third time.
I have no sympathy for him, whatsoever.
3
posted on
03/07/2005 8:17:24 AM PST
by
jdege
To: Cagey
Hell, It sounds like "Three Strikes" is really WORKING...
If the bastard didn't learn from two slaps in the head for being a crook ---- the third swing should remove the bastard from society....
Semper Fi
4
posted on
03/07/2005 8:17:59 AM PST
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Cagey
That's a heavier sentence than many people get for murder.
There has to be more to this. It's as if these judges are trying to create justification to rid themselves of the Three Strikes law.
5
posted on
03/07/2005 8:19:10 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Cagey
I would be for a modified version of "three strikes" law.
I call it the "sentence multiplier" law. If you are convicted of a crime, your sentence is multiplied by the number of previous convictions.
If you were convicted twice for burglary, then you commit a petty crime you get 3 times the sentence for the petty crime - NOT life in prison.
We could lower the 'first crime' sentence length- and keep the repeat offenders in longer.
6
posted on
03/07/2005 8:20:32 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(this space for rent)
To: odoso
Oh for crying out loud, eliminate the three strikes law already.
Institute the 4 strikes law. 4 strikes = lethal injection!
Next.
7
posted on
03/07/2005 8:20:36 AM PST
by
JoeSixPack1
(@100 mph, you have no friends.)
To: Cagey
How many habitual liars do We know? Lock'em all up!
8
posted on
03/07/2005 8:21:26 AM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
( suspect)
To: Cagey
This is one of those cases where I think a judge should be able to use some restraint and give a more appropriate sentence. However, they tend to use that latitude stupidly and give ridiculous sentences for violent crimes as well, which is why the 3 Strikes law was created. Sorry dude, but in you go.
9
posted on
03/07/2005 8:23:17 AM PST
by
theDentist
(The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: Cagey
And just what do people think a twice-convicted felon is going to do with a forged identity?
He's not going to prison for lying. He's going to prison for a continuing history of felonious behavior.
10
posted on
03/07/2005 8:24:19 AM PST
by
LexBaird
("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats" --Jubal Harshaw (RA Heinlein))
To: theDentist
While I agree the judge should have a tiny bit of discretion, this guy was not sentenced for lying.
He was sentenced for two other crimes plus lying. Yes I know he may have already paid for those, but this is part of that payment for those previous crimes.
11
posted on
03/07/2005 8:25:56 AM PST
by
yarddog
To: LexBaird
Well you beat me to it. Same idea.
12
posted on
03/07/2005 8:27:02 AM PST
by
yarddog
To: SWAMPSNIPER
spell check should be (lawyers)
13
posted on
03/07/2005 8:47:24 AM PST
by
bdfromlv
(leavenworth hard time)
To: Cagey
"Reyes does not present an 'extraordinary' rare case; he is a career criminal," Richard Tallman wrote. "Between 1981 and 1997, he committed six crimes and spent almost seven years behind bars, five of which were passed in state prison." "His criminal history reflects the very type and degree of recidivism the Supreme Court recognizes Three Strikes laws were properly intended to address."
I am inlcined to agree with Judge Tallman on this one.
To: Logophile
To: Cagey
Another deceptive title to a newspaper article designed to promote outrage at the system and sympathy for the innocent outlaw. Further reading - way into the article - shows a hint at what's really going on with loser #36549810.
Anyone surprised?
Anyone at all?
To: river rat
Hell, It sounds like "Three Strikes" is really WORKING... ...which is precisely why the bleeding-heart libs are screeching about how unfair it is!
17
posted on
03/07/2005 8:59:01 AM PST
by
TChris
(Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
To: Cagey
Ypu'd think Libs would want more people in jail, as it increases the proportion of homo-normative behavior.
18
posted on
03/07/2005 9:01:42 AM PST
by
evolved_rage
(OLAP SCHMOLAP)
To: Cagey
Convicted of burglary in 1981 and armed robbery in 1987Just imagine how many crimes he got away with. I heard somewhere that only 2% of all crimes result in a conviction.
19
posted on
03/07/2005 9:03:48 AM PST
by
aimhigh
To: Mr. K
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson