Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Small cars test poorly for side impact
AP ^ | 3/7/5 | DEE-ANN DURBIN

Posted on 03/07/2005 7:50:26 AM PST by SmithL

DETROIT - The Dodge Neon, Ford Focus and Volkswagen's New Beetle are among the small cars that got the lowest safety rating in new side-impact crash tests performed by an independent, nonprofit organization.

Eleven of the 13 cars tested earned a "poor," the lowest of four ratings, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety said. The Chevrolet Cobalt and the Toyota Corolla earned the second-highest rating of "acceptable," but only when they were tested with their optional side air bags. They earned "poor" ratings without the air bags.

Other vehicles that earned a "poor" rating were the Hyundai Elantra, Kia Spectra, Mazda 3, Mitsubishi Lancer, Nissan Sentra, Saturn Ion, Suzuki Forenza and Suzuki Aerio. The results were released Sunday.

The institute's test simulates a severe crash. A barrier designed to resemble the front of a pickup or sport utility vehicle hits the side of the vehicle at 31 mph. A "poor" rating means a high chance of serious injury in a similar crash.

Four of the vehicles tested - the Elantra, New Beetle, Forenza and Spectra - have standard, head-protecting side air bags. But the institute's chief operating officer, Adrian Lund, said the cars had poor structure that failed to prevent injuries to the torso and pelvis.

Several of the vehicles offer optional side air bags, but the institute will only test those vehicles without side air bags unless the manufacturer provides a second vehicle with the option installed.

Toyota Motor Co. provided the Corolla with side air bags and General Motors Corp. provided the Cobalt and Saturn Ion. But even when it was tested with its optional side air bags, the Ion got a "poor" rating because the institute said it didn't adequately protect the driver's lower body.

GM said in a statement that the Cobalt and Ion meet or exceed all federal vehicle safety standards and got higher ratings in the institute's frontal crash tests.

The institute was most critical of the Neon, saying the car performed so poorly that the driver likely wouldn't have survived the crash. DaimlerChrysler AG defended the Neon, saying it meets federal safety standards and its performance is similar to other small cars.

"No single test can determine a vehicle's overall safety performance or how the vehicle will perform in a specific crash," DaimlerChrysler said in a statement.

Lund said the ratings were similar to frontal crash test ratings for small cars in 1997. Since then, manufacturers have redesigned those cars and now most get the highest safety rating in frontal crash tests.

"As manufacturers redesign their vehicles, we expect that small cars will get better in the side-impact test too," Lund said.

ON THE NET

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: http://www.iihs.org


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: smallcars; unsafeatanyspeed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I know, let's blame SUVs.
1 posted on 03/07/2005 7:50:27 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on here!


2 posted on 03/07/2005 7:52:09 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

No Duh!......


3 posted on 03/07/2005 7:52:27 AM PST by Red Badger (The South seceded over refusal to end slavery. Blue states want to secede for the same reason......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

In other news, the basic laws of physics have not yet been repealed.


4 posted on 03/07/2005 7:55:13 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (“Every time a system is made foolproof - a new class of fool emerges.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It would not take a rocket scientist to figure that out. Big guy's almost always beat up little guy's.


5 posted on 03/07/2005 7:56:04 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This problem could be solved if we allowed the police to shoot the driver of the SUV whenever there is an SUV/small car crash. That way the fatality rates will even out.

Gotta be fair, after all.


6 posted on 03/07/2005 7:56:07 AM PST by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

LOL!! mass x velocity (squared) right?!

I don't fear SUV's where I live, I drive one, I fear coal trucks going 65 loaded with 60 tons of coal. They don't make anything that can withstand that except another coal truck and I think parking them may be a pain.


7 posted on 03/07/2005 8:00:38 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (Congratulations to my brother in law Mike, 21st in his age group in Ironman New Zealand, March 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama

Yup. When those things hit something, someone's going to die.


8 posted on 03/07/2005 8:03:35 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (“Every time a system is made foolproof - a new class of fool emerges.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

Here's that story. "Acceptable" when equipped with optional side airbags. "Poor" when not.


9 posted on 03/07/2005 8:03:59 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama

Up here in the N. Panhandle, it's trucks loaded with rolls of steel that we have to worry about - not SUVs nor Dodge Neons. Sometimes those rolls slip off and crush nearby cars.


10 posted on 03/07/2005 8:11:16 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
WE are all going to die, the sky is falling, we are all going to die.
11 posted on 03/07/2005 8:17:24 AM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer

My dad used to deliver rolls after he machined them. He is pretty anal about safety and he would get so furious when people would pass him and get back in line right in front of him. Of course the distance after the cut in would not be enough time for him to stop if he had to quickly, and I am sure some snotty attorney would love that case of the big bad truck rearending the dumb driver who just had to pass.


12 posted on 03/07/2005 8:25:30 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (Congratulations to my brother in law Mike, 21st in his age group in Ironman New Zealand, March 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What about safety tests of the new hybrid vehicles? A side or rear impact of a Toyota Prius would I think be a fatal experience as well as a hazardous spill from the battery contents leaking out.


13 posted on 03/07/2005 8:26:05 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Aquinasfan; cyborg
Small cars test poorly for side impact


14 posted on 03/07/2005 8:27:55 AM PST by Petronski (Have you heard the rumor? Choco ration's going up! Double-plus good, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They don't do real hot in rear or front end collisions where vector speeds are up about 40MPH.

But then I own two SUVs, so I don't much care!

15 posted on 03/07/2005 8:28:17 AM PST by Logic n' Reason (Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Oh, by the way, the same is going to be true of ANY unibody vehicle.


Trucks, most SUVs and the Ford Crown Victoria are constructed using body-on-frame construction. I love my Vic.


16 posted on 03/07/2005 8:30:09 AM PST by Petronski (Have you heard the rumor? Choco ration's going up! Double-plus good, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator

Here is your winnings sir.


17 posted on 03/07/2005 8:30:37 AM PST by tcostell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

BUMP!!!


18 posted on 03/07/2005 8:33:16 AM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Hehehehehe...


19 posted on 03/07/2005 8:34:14 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WV Mountain Mama

Based on my observations, most accidents involving trucks and cars were precipitated by a stupid move on the part of the driver of the car. The maneuver you described is too common for comfort.


20 posted on 03/07/2005 8:36:24 AM PST by Disambiguator (Encouraging heteronormativity wherever I go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson