Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ECONOMIC LOSSES DUE TO SMOKING BANS IN CALIFORNA AND OTHER STATES
United Pro Choice ^ | 3-6-05 | David W. Kuneman and Michael J. McFadden

Posted on 03/06/2005 1:44:26 PM PST by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-258 next last
To: bobdsmith

"I assume you are all for the legalisation of marijuana in public restaurants then. Can't have that pesky government telling the owners what can and cannot be smoked in their own establishment can we."

If it were a legal commodity, then the property owner should have the ability to allow its consumption. But then, your straw man argument lends itself to a lot of "ifs".


121 posted on 03/07/2005 6:10:32 AM PST by CSM (Currently accepting applications for the position of stay at home mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

"Oh don't be such an ass. Cigarettes are a legal commodity. Always has been."

The illegality of marijuana has been set by the kind of interference of government that you have said you don't agree with. It seems to me that you don't actually mind the government restricting what other people can do as long as they aren't restricting you. I wonder if you would mind if you were in the position where someone was legally smoking a joint near you in a restaurant.

The differences between the overall bad effects of marijuana use and tobacco use are negliable. There is logically no reason to support one and want to ban the other.

Your arguments in support of tobacco have destroyed most of the common arguments against legalising marijuana anyway. For example one common argument against legalising maruijana is that it would cost the taxpayers lots in paying for the medical effects. But you have already destroyed that argument by pointing out that tobacco users pay these costs through their purchases (and it would be no different with marijuana)


122 posted on 03/07/2005 6:14:09 AM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: CSM
I don't have any connection to this shadowy group you call the anti-smoking lobby. If you say the lobby exists I will have to take your word on it. I thought that public opinion had just turned against the smoker. Smokers had their way for many many years and non smokers said nothing. You smoked any place any time and never asked permission, it was a given. We hated it but said nothing. The tide has turned and you blame some big shadowy group for it. Maybe so, I think it is just numbers and smokers are on the low side.
123 posted on 03/07/2005 6:23:47 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

It's urban warfare


124 posted on 03/07/2005 6:32:12 AM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
NO one knows the date of our death except our maker. When it's my time to go, it won't matter one iota if I ever smoked or not.

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BTW, that goes for seat belts too, but that is another whole thread.

LOVE the cartoon. Sums it up much better than a myriad of words. I must admit I had not heard they upped the ante to 20 years, I thought it was still only 10...maybe I should quit. HAHAHAHAHAHAH
As Dennis Leary said long ago, "People, who cares, those are the DIAPER YEARS!" I agree with Dennis.
125 posted on 03/07/2005 6:34:32 AM PST by Just A Nobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: All
What it means to be a Private Business Owner:

      

  

 

126 posted on 03/07/2005 6:34:57 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot; All

The real proof is to count the number of restaurant/pub CLOSURES AN BANKRUPTSIES before and after the bans take place!


127 posted on 03/07/2005 6:35:18 AM PST by mdmathis6 (By playing the Devil's advocate, one can often separate self from the Devil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
LOVE the cartoon. Sums it up much better than a myriad of words. I must admit I had not heard they upped the ante to 20 years, I thought it was still only 10...maybe I should quit. HAHAHAHAHAHAH
As Dennis Leary said long ago, "People, who cares, those are the DIAPER YEARS!" I agree with Dennis.

I LOVE Dennis!  I can't wait for Rescue Me to start again.  He is my kind of guy.  LOL! 



128 posted on 03/07/2005 6:40:28 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Well said!


129 posted on 03/07/2005 6:43:38 AM PST by Enterprise (President George W. Bush - the leading insurgent detergent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: bobdsmith
The illegality of marijuana has been set by the kind of interference of government that you have said you don't agree with. It seems to me that you don't actually mind the government restricting what other people can do as long as they aren't restricting you. I wonder if you would mind if you were in the position where someone was legally smoking a joint near you in a restaurant.

Listen. This is about cigarettes and tobacco products.  Legal.

Pot = not legal.  

Also, pot heads are getting their rights while smoker's are losing ours.  I see no justice. And I would much rather pass a smoker on the highway any day then a pot smoker.  At least my cigarettes don't make me a limp dishrag and/or make me all la la in the head!

Once pot is made legal, we can then discuss it.  For now, I stick with legal commodities.

130 posted on 03/07/2005 6:44:36 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
The real proof is to count the number of restaurant/pub CLOSURES AN BANKRUPTSIES before and after the bans take place!

They have already done that.  Haven't you read any of the links???

131 posted on 03/07/2005 6:45:49 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

"Maybe only 25-30% of the people in the state smoke, but you take away 25-30% of the revenue and it's going to hurt."

I must say...since I don't believe the other "statistics" I find it hard to believe this one. By pure observation alone I would say it is also bogus! Few will admit to smoking these days due to the demonization of the act. Meanwhile, you can smoke crack on most street corners or subway bathrooms, but that's ok, they need help.


132 posted on 03/07/2005 6:46:41 AM PST by Just A Nobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I think it is just numbers and smokers are on the low side

You WISH!

And if you DO get your way and there are no more smokers, guess what?  They will be coming after something YOU enjoy.

Pull out your wallet and bend over.  Then we will see how YOU like it. heh!

133 posted on 03/07/2005 6:47:53 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Look up the American Lung Association's agenda, or RWJF. Most non-smokers and smokers find a way to interact without all the vitroil (sp?) and both of these groups are conent with the choice being left to the private property owner. It is the anti agenda that is for demoloshing the choice of the property owner.

To get back to the point, it is not the fault of the non smoker or the smoker that the businesses are harmed. It is the fault of to much government intrusion. Many "conservatives" applaud this government intrusion. A shocking turn if you ask me.


134 posted on 03/07/2005 6:49:21 AM PST by CSM (Currently accepting applications for the position of stay at home mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
I must say...since I don't believe the other "statistics" I find it hard to believe this one. By pure observation alone I would say it is also bogus! Few will admit to smoking these days due to the demonization of the act. Meanwhile, you can smoke crack on most street corners or subway bathrooms, but that's ok, they need help.

Oh yes!  Get this:  Maine has opened THREE METH clinics!  I couldn't believe it.  Our tax dollars going into clinics for the druggies. 

135 posted on 03/07/2005 6:49:36 AM PST by SheLion (The America we once knew and loved ........................is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Garnet Dawn
Do you have the same objections to taxes on beer, wine, liquor, perfume, etc.? If not, then it seems a bit hypocritical to merely object to those on tobacco products. If you object to those taxes on other nonessential products, then why are you only carping about those on tobacco?
136 posted on 03/07/2005 6:53:32 AM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The posting spoke only of revenue growths and losses...I didn't see any links regarding the closures and bankruptsies unless some of the posters I haven't read on this thread yet have posted the links you speak of!


137 posted on 03/07/2005 6:56:21 AM PST by mdmathis6 (By playing the Devil's advocate, one can often separate self from the Devil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
...I am not making you pay jackcrap for medicare for me, nor am I indigent, nor I have I spent all my money on "my habit" or its results...I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING UP MEDICAL RESEARCH MONEY...

Perhaps you, personally, aren't yet, nor, if you are lucky, ever will... However, a number of your fellow smokers are doing so.

FYI: My cousin died of cancer 3 years ago at 53 years old. Her death bed words to her 24 year old daughter were: I never smoked,... My aunt died at 44 years old of lung cancer. She, nor anyone in her family smoked...

I am sorry for your loss. Unfortunately, I have lost several aunts, uncles and cousins to cancer, all of whom smoked. Your point, which appears to be that smoking is not tied to cancer, is not made statistically because you can cite a few exceptions. I suggest you consult the CDC statistics in this area and you will find a far different picture.
138 posted on 03/07/2005 7:02:51 AM PST by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CSM

"The will of the people as expressed through their elected representatives is within the bounds of "liberty" as long as there is no infringement upon the constitutions of either the individual state or the US."

BAAAWWWAAAGGGGHHHH!!!!

YOU CAN NOT POSSIBLY BELIEVE THIS! My will has not once been considered regarding this issue. I have NOT ONE TIME voted for non-smoking anything. Please tell me where that option has been made available and I will be enroute by noon to establish residency.

IT IS JUST ABOUT THE MONEY S I L L Y !!


139 posted on 03/07/2005 7:07:05 AM PST by Just A Nobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Do you ever get of Maine and see how few smokers there are in other areas of the country?


140 posted on 03/07/2005 7:08:24 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson