Skip to comments.
Carly's Way (Hungarian Immigrant Engineer Describes HP Under Carly)
MIT Technology Review ^
| 4 March 2005
| Michelle Delio
Posted on 03/06/2005 7:51:17 AM PST by HolgerDansk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
21
posted on
03/06/2005 8:17:40 AM PST
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: Blueflag
It was also at the same time very Machiavellian (full of back-stabbing and comments made about you after the meeting was over.)Definitely feminized, and I'm a woman. I'm pretty far down on the employment food chain, but I know that when you have some types of women running the show...it's hell.
To: HolgerDansk
I agree
Too many companies that were started by engineers are taken over by bean counters.
The bean counters can raise profits in the short term but hurt the company in the long run.
23
posted on
03/06/2005 8:21:50 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
To: Just mythoughts
DEC those were the good old days.... I was at DEC 1977 to 1994. The last few weren't so great but the first dozen or so were wonderful.
To: yarddog
"I have only had one female supervisor who did a good job, (she was very good btw), and I have noticed that women too seem to prefer a male supervisor." Well, I have thus far only had one female supervisor, and she was the most incompetent manager I have ever seen (this was in R&D of a major chemical company). She knew neither technology nor management.
To: TheSpottedOwl
I bought a HP Pavillion pc back in 2001. Worst pile of junk I've ever owned. 6 hard drives had to be replaced within a 2 year period. An HP for pete's sake. Yeah, but aren't those cases snazzy?
Term papers were lost :( I bought an eMachine this time.
Out of the fire, into the frying pan.
26
posted on
03/06/2005 8:28:02 AM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Blueflag
Efforts and intentions were rewarded more than outcomes and results. Can you imagine Fiorina as a World War II battlefield general conversing with Patton?
"George you're too hard on the men. You don't care enough for their self-esteem and you've made no efforts to fully integrate gays and transvestites into your strategy and plans. As a result, you're not getting the full rich diversity of efforts and ideas that would make you successful. In my army division everyone's a winner. If one soldier gets a silver star they all get silver stars because we realize that success is not an individual achievement. And we don't judge heroism or achievement by hills taken, machine gun nests taken out, or number of enemy killed. The mess hall soldier who prepares a thoughtful and colorful centerpiece for the mess hall table is just as important as the soldier who single-handedly takes out a platoon of German infantry. The mess hall soldier's efforts are no less heroic just because he doesn't spill gallons of blood. He brings happiness and joy to others with a splash of color and whimsy, and that's heroic in a special way. I'm warning you, George, you're not going to win any battles until you learn to engage the 'inner children' of your men and make them all feel important and valued for their good intentions irrespective of results."
27
posted on
03/06/2005 8:28:45 AM PST
by
JCEccles
(If Jimmy Carter were a country, he'd be Canada.)
To: Wonder Warthog
The good one we had was middle aged, heavy set and real good natured. She sort of had a Mother complex but could give orders with no trouble.
All of the bad ones were the petty, hysterical type, just looking for someone to do something wrong, even if it were minor.
Of our male supervisors, maybe 2/3 were good ones. A couple of the good ones were extraordinarily good. All the good ones were at least slightly tough but always fair minded.
28
posted on
03/06/2005 8:29:50 AM PST
by
yarddog
To: HolgerDansk; SierraWasp; Liz; BOBTHENAILER; Southack
A quick and easy description of Carly's leadership would a Politically Correct Caretaker.
The healthcare and electronics industry is loaded with Carly's of all 3 sexes. When, they get into control of a company, they destroy the research pipelines, drive away the creative people, punish the 10% who bring in 90% of the sales/business. Then, they reward the politically correct maggots hired and promoted to carry out this self destructive strategy.
In a few years, most of the good people have left the company. The company drops from market and research leadership to a me too. If allowed to stay after 5 years, the company permanently becomes a me too company.
We have seen the same thing happen in the CIA, State Department, FBI, Justice Department and other Federal and state departments. The Clintoons put in their hand picked losers to head these departments. The hand picked losers hired thousands of anti America losers, interested in pushing the PC line instead of the original mission of the department.
29
posted on
03/06/2005 8:33:19 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
To: yarddog
"The good one we had was middle aged, heavy set and real good natured. She sort of had a Mother complex but could give orders with no trouble." Well, the old gal I'm talking about was similar. The only problem was that her orders weren't connected to any form of knowledge or rational thought.
To: Grampa Dave
A quick and easy description of Carly's leadership would a Politically Correct CaretakerOr, rather, a politically correct undertaker.
31
posted on
03/06/2005 8:42:08 AM PST
by
JCEccles
(If Jimmy Carter were a country, he'd be Canada.)
To: HolgerDansk
This article is right on the money...it epitomizes just ONE thing wrong with the technology industry in this country, and highlights why Long TERM technology trends are what is important.
Carly's attitude in fact is symptomatic of the attitudes of many Harvard MBA trained types in management who lead technical companies and who don't themselves have a technical background...there seems to be an underlying animus, perhaps borne out of the realization that they cant do what their geeky engineering staff does.
The fact is that a technical career is no longer seen as a legitimate high paying profession by society as a whole, in contrast to the legal profession. Our failure to maintain parity in our educational system with the rest of the world in training future scientists and engineers is further proof of that.
American graduate schools have become the exclusive domain of people not born in this country, many of which now return after graduate school to their native countries to innovate. The recent trend, IMO, also shows more and more cutting edge IEEE papers coming out of foreign university research programs.
You can also blame high tech guest worker bills which have destroyed the free market labor supply and demand for native American technical people.
You can also blame our tax and regulatory systems. Anyone price liability insurance lately? Our legal system is making it very very hard for the small Wozniak - Jobs garage shop Apple computer model to be replicated.
All told...large American leading edge tech companies are increasingly migrating high tech design facilities to Ireland, Scotland, India, Israel...as well as the ubiquitous China.
And all we are told in response to this by financial, political, and legal types is that all is well...
32
posted on
03/06/2005 8:45:17 AM PST
by
Dat Mon
(will work for clever tagline)
To: HolgerDansk
Carly was a marketing person put in change of engineers, a person who cared nothing about the art and beauty of technology. She just wanted saleable stock to bring to market. The irony for Carly is that HP did not increase its share price as a result of her tenure there.
33
posted on
03/06/2005 8:46:29 AM PST
by
mac_truck
(Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
To: HolgerDansk
The Clinton Administration killed off the bulk of government technology research funding ("corporate welfare", don'tcha know), while the current generation of Harvard MBAs views research as a double negative -- unpredictable and long-term. Actually, the Clinton Adminstration expanded government technology research funding. It started the Advanced Technoloby Program, it changed the name of "Defense Advanced Research Programs Administration" to "Advanced Research Projects Administration" and encouraged more industrial research, and it promoted Cooperative Research and Development Agreements for joint research between government and industrial labs.
ARPA is back to DARPA, ATP has been killed, and I think that CRADAs have been scaled way back under the Bush Adminstration.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Unlikely since Carly is a Republican..
35
posted on
03/06/2005 8:54:41 AM PST
by
rahbert
To: Just mythoughts; HolgerDansk
Ahhh DEC..... we used to have so many VAXes and Micro VAXes.... where are they all now?
I didn't think I would live to see the day when DEC, HP, and now AT&T no longer existed as corporations. Where's Ken Olsen now?
36
posted on
03/06/2005 9:00:28 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: Dat Mon
> Carly's attitude in fact is symptomatic of the attitudes of many Harvard MBA trained types in management who lead technical companies and
who don't themselves have a technical background...
Tell me about it! The B-school clown to whom our company was entrusted boasted, boasted that he hadn't written any code in 10 years, and that he wasn't about to learn about ours. The company went under within 10 months.
Women *can* make effective CEOs. Martha Stewart, for example (passing over the recent unpleasantness). Carly just wasn't one of them.
37
posted on
03/06/2005 9:01:27 AM PST
by
cloud8
To: 12 Gauge Mossberg
They're still out there. It can't be stopped, not by frauds like Carly Fiorina nor any others.
38
posted on
03/06/2005 9:03:24 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: HolgerDansk
"Carly was a marketing person put in change of engineers, a person who cared nothing about the art and beauty of technology." Affirmative action.
39
posted on
03/06/2005 9:06:51 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
To: yarddog
I have only had one female supervisor who did a good job, (she was very good btw), and I have noticed that women too seem to prefer a male supervisor. I have worked for two female program managers in the last ten years. One was the best manager I have ever worked for I would not hesitate if I ever have the opportunity to work for her again. The other was the worst micromanaging, lot-of-work-and-effort-with-no-value-to-the-program and loss of productivity manager I have ever experienced. Bottom line, there are good women managers and there are bad women managers just as with the male counterparts.
40
posted on
03/06/2005 9:08:05 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson