1 posted on
03/05/2005 10:21:20 PM PST by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
1000 , I guess I gave the Rats to much credit , I would have thought there fraud would be much ,much more. Still did the trick this time though.
2 posted on
03/05/2005 10:25:46 PM PST by
Deetes
To: CHARLITE
The problem with nullifying THIS election is that it creates an entirely new dynamic for people actually pulling the lever in the booth.
What SHOULD happen is that votes should be scrutinized individually, bad ones subtracted, the rest totalled, and a winner declared.
Regardless, it appears there's some major work to do on insuring the validity of each vote, and the overall voting process.
3 posted on
03/05/2005 10:27:34 PM PST by
jra
To: CHARLITE
Interesting that the media will quote a number like Ron Sims 99.98% number even though it was immediately challenged and proven to be false (kind of like the Rathergate memos). But they will still refer back to it without giving it context. For the record it was 99.8%. Ron Sims said any bank would be proud to have that error rate.
Someone pointed out to him that that would mean the bank would lose $2,000 on every $1,000,000 transaction and did he really think a bank would be proud of that.
If this election wasn't stolen then there has never been a stolen election. If any election deserves to be challenged then this one does.
6 posted on
03/05/2005 10:41:07 PM PST by
djwright
To: CHARLITE
Harry Korrell, Rossi's chief attorney, said earlier he was "99.999 percent confident" that the list of felons was accurate. Shortly after that, King County Executive Ron Sims said the county's administration of the election was "99.98 percent accurate."
"We'll see how Harry Korrell's 99.999 percent accuracy matches up to Ron Sims' 99.98," said Democratic attorney Jenny Durkan.
I understand that they are talking about apples and oranges, but having 99.999% certainty of the accuracy of 1,000 felons on a voter list is still good for 999.99 people.
To: CHARLITE
...Bridges has said Republicans must show the illegal votes "appear" to have changed the outcome, but hasn't yet ruled on the level of specificity that will be required during the trial. ...
If even half of the 1000 votes should not have been counted, over three times the margin of victory, then I would say there's no "appears" to it, and you cannot assume beyond a reasonable doubt that Gregoire won this election.
I'm from Texas, not Washington. You guys deserve a revote.
11 posted on
03/05/2005 11:24:13 PM PST by
planekT
To: CHARLITE
Let's hope democracy spreads to the state of Washington.
12 posted on
03/05/2005 11:35:44 PM PST by
My2Cents
(America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
To: CHARLITE
It really doesn't matter what crimes the RATs get caught commiting. Nothing ever happens, and nobody is ever punished. If all the RAT politicians who stole their offices were thrown out, there wouldn't be many left. Think Louisiana and Missouri, for example.
To: CHARLITE
The rats have tied their own tail in a knot. They have ALWAYS used voter fraud to steal elections knowing that the rat media would protect them. Now that the ratmedia can't even protect themselves, the rats are standing out in the open with their hands on their asses.
We probably won't win this one. Dino will probably be denied, but this case will go a long way toward helping the rat party slide down the tubes.
20 posted on
03/06/2005 7:19:21 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(In dealing with liberals remember When you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
To: CHARLITE
A few questions that I have not seen answered.
1) Is this comprehensive?
2) In the county ? In the State?
3) What percentage went for the dem? (I bet 80+)
4) Will the pubbies follow through?
Time will tell.
25 posted on
03/06/2005 2:04:38 PM PST by
lawdude
(Liberalism is a mental disease.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson