Skip to comments.
Pot grow ops a 'scourge': McLellan
Posted on 03/04/2005 4:15:11 PM PST by Clive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
1
posted on
03/04/2005 4:15:11 PM PST
by
Clive
To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...
2
posted on
03/04/2005 4:15:42 PM PST
by
Clive
To: Clive
3
posted on
03/04/2005 4:16:23 PM PST
by
BCrago66
To: Clive
Translation, we will go ahead with our decriminalization of pot, however we will make tougher laws against grow-ops.
IDIOTS.
4
posted on
03/04/2005 4:18:44 PM PST
by
youngtory
(Rights are rights are rights. Just like a proof is a proof is a proof.-Liberal dorks.)
To: BCrago66
5
posted on
03/04/2005 4:20:12 PM PST
by
Clive
To: Clive
Strange use of the word "grow". Don't they speak English up there any more?
6
posted on
03/04/2005 4:22:50 PM PST
by
AndrewB
To: Clive
I happen to think that the increased criminilazation of marijuana upped the stakes and made the risks of growing it or selling it too high for the average person. So since there will always be a demand for pot (and no I do not smoke it anymore) someone has to supply it. Guess who fills that gap- yep a Marijuana cartel. These criminals are brutal and should be dealt with as the law demands. But if marijuana was treated much like alcohol we would remove the reason for such criminals to be involved. Think the gangsters of prohibition. Oh and I do not think legaliziing pot means we should legalize any and all drugs. I just hate the idea of good police officers losing their lives over pot. It is just senseless and way too sad.
To: youngtory
TWOD is and has been a complete failure IMO. All it has accomplished is to enrich and provide incentives to the law breakers by raising street prices, fill prisons with countless non violent offenders and spawn a very expensive and intrusive bureaucracy of enforcement. This from the same Gov't that can't prevent 3 Million humans from entering the US at will.
Don't know the answer but the current approach will never work.
8
posted on
03/04/2005 4:27:47 PM PST
by
drt1
To: drt1
What's consistent about the liberals that despite their ideas wouldn't work they go ahead of it anyway.
9
posted on
03/04/2005 4:29:48 PM PST
by
youngtory
(Rights are rights are rights. Just like a proof is a proof is a proof.-Liberal dorks.)
To: AndrewB
What word to you use for the process of cultivating cannabis?
And the word "grow" is quite apt, considering the size which these plants attain before being harvested.
Grow-ops are becoming a major problem for police and the neighbors of the growers and possibly unsuspecting landlords. A house that is used to grow cannabis is effectively destroyed and if the grow-op is in a city house the damage can extend to the houses next door.
One thing that the Supreme Court of Canada did right was to allow the use of infra red to spot grow-ops. These grow-ops put out distinctive intense heat signatures so a FLIR can be used from a chopper to survey a suspected location or neighborhood to get the evidence to support a warrant.
10
posted on
03/04/2005 4:34:58 PM PST
by
Clive
To: youngtory
Translation, we will go ahead with our decriminalization of pot, however we will make tougher laws against grow-ops. I seem to recall the Canadian government ended up losing money growing pot.
Socialist Twits.
11
posted on
03/04/2005 4:48:08 PM PST
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: Clive
McLellan undoubtedly knows more a little about "scourges" ...
... as that's precisely what she and the Liberal Party have been towards everything ethical and (or) moral in this country for over a decade now!
12
posted on
03/04/2005 4:49:00 PM PST
by
GMMAC
(lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
To: GMMAC
Galatians 6
6 Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
13
posted on
03/04/2005 4:56:56 PM PST
by
PaxMacian
(Gen 1:29)
To: lastchance
Maybe they should have a guest pot grower program.
14
posted on
03/04/2005 4:57:32 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!!)
To: Clive
Smoking pot is a recreational drug for irresonsible losers and that about covers it.
Dealers and distributers of the stuff should be in jail for a year or so depending on the amount and number of crimes.
15
posted on
03/04/2005 4:59:32 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Clive
One thing that the Supreme Court of Canada did right was to allow the use of infra red to spot grow-ops.Screw privacy ... we must sacrifice all to fight the Demon Weed!
16
posted on
03/04/2005 5:00:58 PM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: PaxMacian
I don't think God would be upset toward that poster regarding the libertarian cult. If anything, the guy was defending ethics which are based on some of the Ten Commandments given to Moses through God.
17
posted on
03/04/2005 5:01:38 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Clive
All of society bears responsibility for recognizing the national boom in grow operations that are typically backed by organized crime, McLellan said Friday.And pot criminalizers bear responsibility for creating the conditions in which grow operations backed by organized crime flourish.
18
posted on
03/04/2005 5:02:49 PM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: A CA Guy
Smoking pot is a recreational drug for irresonsible losers and that about covers it.
And how is this different from Alcohol?
19
posted on
03/04/2005 5:05:02 PM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!!)
To: Know your rights
Again you shift blame. Blame the suppliers and especially the users. If people weren't idiots and didn't demand the crap, then this wouldn't be an issue.
However there's a substantial part of the planet that are simply idiots.
20
posted on
03/04/2005 5:05:02 PM PST
by
G32
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson