Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terminally Ill Cancer Patient Survives Doctor-Assisted Suicide Attempt in Oregon
Tampa Bay on line ^ | March 4, 2005 | The Associated Press

Posted on 03/04/2005 12:28:13 PM PST by aculeus

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - A terminally ill cancer patient who tried to end his life with drugs prescribed under Oregon's assisted-suicide law awoke three days later, alert and talkative, his wife said.

David Prueitt, who had lung cancer, took what was believed to be a fatal dose of a barbiturate prescribed by his doctor in January. He fell into a coma within minutes, but woke up three days later, said his wife Lynda Romig Prueitt.

Prueitt's wife told The Oregonian newspaper that he asked, "Why am I not dead?"

Prueitt, 42, lived for two more weeks before dying of natural causes at his Estacada home, about 35 miles southeast of Portland.

The state Department of Human Services will turn the case over to the Board of Medical Examiners or state Board of Pharmacy to determine if the procedure or drugs were faulty, said Dr. Katrina Hedberg, assistant state epidemiologist.

Complications with doctor-assisted suicides are rare. In 2001, a patient took 37 hours to die after ingesting a lethal dose, and in 2003, a patient took 48 hours to die. Neither regained consciousness.

Since the law took effect in 1997, more than 170 people in Oregon have used it to end their lives. The law is meant for only extremely sick people - those with incurable diseases who two doctors agree have six months or less to live and are of sound mind.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that states have the right to decide whether to allow doctor-assisted suicides, but it announced last month it will review the law again following an appeal by the Bush administration.

AP-ES-03-04-05 1506EST


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; euthanasia; healthcare; hypocriticoath; naturescourse; oops; turass; whathippocraticoath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: aculeus

Will his family now sue the doctor for malpractice, for failing to complete the procedure properly? Unfortunately, many courts would probably allow such a suit to proceed.


21 posted on 03/04/2005 12:58:26 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
John Edwards assures me that this will not hamper the lawsuit in anyway.

Not only that, but had we elected John Kerry, the man would be walking!

22 posted on 03/04/2005 1:00:00 PM PST by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Just another example of how individuals react differently to drugs. This guy was on one end of the ever-present bell curve.


23 posted on 03/04/2005 1:00:22 PM PST by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: mlc9852

Yep, I was told that it just eases their passing, so that they won't fight to breathe.


25 posted on 03/04/2005 1:09:23 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He is dead, did you read the article. But his widow could still sue for mental anguish.


26 posted on 03/04/2005 1:10:11 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Terminally Ill Cancer Patient Survives Doctor...

That is what I read. At first I thought the doctor had dropped dead in the meantime, and the patient outlived him...until I read part of the post.

27 posted on 03/04/2005 1:13:54 PM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dahicks

Most of these people are completely bedridden, and some even quadraplegics. They are not able to "go" anywhere on their own, or do much beyond operate a drug self-administration device that somebody else has filled. Such devices are routinely used on both terminal and non-terminal patients to allow the patient to control the amount and timing of pain medication, but except in assisted suicide cases, are set up in a way which makes deliberate or accidental self-administration of a lethal dose impossible.


28 posted on 03/04/2005 1:24:18 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK
A drawn out "natural" death is a miserable, pathetic experience for everyone involved. I wouldn't let a dog I didn't like suffer like that, let alone a person.

Exactly. There's something way wrong with a society which insists that humans die in a way which would constitute illegal cruelty if done to an animal.

29 posted on 03/04/2005 1:26:15 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
So what was the problem with merely waiting 17 days for the guy to die naturally?

Have you ever been around someone dying from cancer or a similar disease during their last few days of life? I've seen family members go like that, and it's horrible. Why should the patient have to endure such a terrible end when they can go comfortably and at their own volition? We treat farm animals and household pets better than we treat dying people.

And, just to touch on the issue of states' rights, if Oregon voters want assisted suicide to be legal in their state, why should the federal government (or other states) have any right to deny Oregonians their wishes?

30 posted on 03/04/2005 1:33:11 PM PST by nyg4168
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dahicks

Not everyone is in a physical state to do it, especially late terminals. The hands might be too weak to lift a 3 lbs handgun, and to pull the slide to chamber the cartridge is to grab the slide strongly and to pull against 15-25 lbs recoil spring.


31 posted on 03/04/2005 1:41:33 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: nyg4168

A slow human death can be a very long and painful experience. I've always said that I wanted to die under anesthesia on an operating room table. Where your unconscious and feel nothing.

The same way they put people down for the death penalty basically.


33 posted on 03/04/2005 2:10:16 PM PST by herkbird (PAIN SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK
A drawn out "natural" death is a miserable, pathetic experience for everyone involved.

Amazing that people have been dying just that way for thousands and thousands of years, huh?

34 posted on 03/04/2005 2:19:15 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Which John Edwards? Hmm well both of them channel anyway.


35 posted on 03/04/2005 2:24:43 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dahicks
Doesn't the oath that they claim to abide by say, in part, "I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion." - or something to that affect?

The Hippocratic Oath is not a matter of law. It'd be like a boy scout violating the Scouts Honor.

36 posted on 03/04/2005 2:30:18 PM PST by Beemnseven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Apparently, there are different versions of the Hippocratic Oath.
37 posted on 03/04/2005 2:31:52 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dahicks
"Doesn't the oath that they claim to abide by say, in part, "I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a pessary to produce abortion." - or something to that affect?"

Guess what. Doctors don't have to take the Hippcrate Oath any more. Great society we live in, huh?

38 posted on 03/04/2005 2:34:35 PM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly

Hippcrate = Hippocratic


39 posted on 03/04/2005 2:35:38 PM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dahicks

There are different versions of the oath. Many doctors have refused to take any version prohibiting abortions, and I expect some versions also are structured to allow for patient-requested assistance with bringing about death. At a medical school graduation I attended a few years ago, there were two different versions of the oath used, and the graduating class about evenly split in which one they chose -- there were two group recitations, one right after the other. At any rate, the oath is really just a tradition, like reciting the Pledge of Allegiance, and has no legal significance. I've recited the Pledge without complaint whenever it was expected of me, but I most certainly don't buy into its socialist origins and its anti-states' rights "one nation . . . indivisible" cr*p.


40 posted on 03/04/2005 2:37:35 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson