Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Jump In Gas Prices Predicted [24 cents!]
CBS News ^ | 3/3/2005 | CBS/AP

Posted on 03/04/2005 7:45:04 AM PST by Quick1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last
To: paleocon patriarch
Why would an administration comprised of oil men want to lower the price of gas (and oil company profits)?

Oops, my fault. I must have logged on to DU by mistake.

101 posted on 03/04/2005 9:37:01 AM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

Drilling ANWAR by itself might not, but add that to the huge reserves in California that can't be touched and at the margin it would make difference.


102 posted on 03/04/2005 9:37:04 AM PST by NEBUCHADNEZZAR1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Huck

When car makers start making smaller cars that can accomodate bigger people, maybe more truck driving men will switch to cars. Right now, we shop for cars by having my husband sit behind the wheel, and frankly, aside from some full size models, he just doesn't fit comfortably enough to drive more than one hour. Even most of the medium sized SUVs are too small. He's six'6" and either his head hits the roof or his knees hit the dash.


103 posted on 03/04/2005 9:39:27 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sagebrush58
There are SUV's (highlanders, rav4s, CRVs, escapes) and there are SUVs (Ford Excursions, Nissan Armadas, Hummers etc.) Some aren't so bad with gas.

When I pull up next to one of those SUV pretenders in my Expedition, I think of that line from Crocodile Dundee when he says "That's not a knife, THIS is a knife."

104 posted on 03/04/2005 9:44:47 AM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Sorry about that. This thread is just getting on my nerves. I am not used to seeing all these conspiricy theories and requests for government intervention on this site. Are people bailing on their principles when it hits their pocket book?


105 posted on 03/04/2005 9:52:17 AM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
"$2 a gallon we think is easily within reach and probably in the next couple of months,"

It's been $2 a gallon here since last fall and likely to go higher because it will soon be time to change to our "summer" blend, thanks to the EPA and a couple of bad air days foisted on us by winds blowing north from Chicago.

106 posted on 03/04/2005 9:59:13 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Northwest Indiana and Chicago area went up as much as 33 cents from last night to this morning, every station changed overnight.
107 posted on 03/04/2005 9:59:26 AM PST by southlake_hoosier (.... One Nation, Under God.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Quick1

I don't care about the price of crude oil in the rest of the world. I care about the price of oil and gas HERE. We have off shore wells sitting idle, and land locked wells also sitting idle because of socialist environmental laws making the USA dependent on the world market.
WE need to use the resources WE have to affect the price of oil and gas HERE, the rest of the world can pay the highest prices for middle east oil.
WE have to build better, modern refineries. We have had our hands tied by the left and have not even built or updated our electricity generating plants.
ALL of this has hurt US and driven up the price of EVERYTHING we buy. I am not saying screw the environment we need to be responsible with our natural resources and protect our national forests. but restricting upgrades and new facilities for energy production because it might hurt a frog or moth is really stupid.


108 posted on 03/04/2005 10:03:56 AM PST by coincheck (support our troops, they are the best bar none (sua sponte))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Enjoy your SUV's suckers.

No problem, I will.

109 posted on 03/04/2005 10:06:46 AM PST by hattend (Liberals! Beware the Perfect Rovian Storm [All Hail the Evil War Monkey King, Chimpus Khan!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eva
You don't have to be as big as your husband to find the new cars uncomfortable. We are still driving 2 Chrysler LHSs, each over 10 years old and with 180,000 miles on each because NONE of the cars hold a candle to them for comfort. The only car that comes close to 1994 Chrysler comfort is the Cadillac DeVille, it it doesn't get quite as good gas mileage. We just attended the Milwaukee Auto Show and sat in them all.

The Jags are the funniest. Although attractive in design, the dealers displayed them with the front seats jammed all the way back against the back seats, and they still were not comfortable!

110 posted on 03/04/2005 10:07:38 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
I don't know. I was just making an objective observation.

My brother has a super human sized vehicle, I suspect that he has it (like the so many owners of these things) just as a status statement. He lives alone and hauls nothing but himself anywhere. It would be different if he needed the room for a bunch or kids or for work. He doesn't. I wonder how he likes filling the thing up these days? I tell him..."Because you want to drive stegosaurus Rex, I have to pay $3.00 a gallon for gas." Even he doesn't argue that one.
111 posted on 03/04/2005 10:08:45 AM PST by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sagebrush58

It is an interesting question that's slowly being raised if eminent domain could be applied to patents.


112 posted on 03/04/2005 10:09:36 AM PST by rottweiller_inc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

My husband has always wanted a Corvette and when he finally had the money to buy one, he went to the dealer and he couldn't even get inside the car. He was so disappointed, then he tried a Porche with the same result.


113 posted on 03/04/2005 10:13:34 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

Not much unfortunately, though we should be building nukes. Problem is nuclear is an electrical generating power source, whereas very little oil is used for electical generation- we shifted away from that in the 1970s.

We use oil for:

Motor vehicles- 9 million barrels a day
Airplanes- 1.6 million barrels a day
Distillate fuel oil- 4.1 million bbl/day
Residual fuel oil- 0.8 million bbl/d

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/usa.html

That accounts for 76% of the total according the above source with the remaining 24% I suppose going into feedstocks for industrial chemicals and goods such as pesticides, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals and plastics

Now some feedstocks are obtained from natural gas and coal and suppose we might be able to shift that away from oil even further. For motor vehicles we might over time be able to shift from gasoline and diesel to a combination of biodiesel, hydrogen, batteries. As for the airlines- I think in their current form they are in deep trouble. I don't know of any way to power a plane without using oil based fuels.


114 posted on 03/04/2005 10:20:53 AM PST by NYorkerInHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Hey Rockin,

I found this site years ago:

http://www.ohio3rdfrontier.org/


115 posted on 03/04/2005 10:25:32 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYorkerInHouston

Well, that's not a very hopeful picture is it?

On the bright side, we would probably save enough on our utility bills (nuke energy) to be able to afford gas for our cars. LOL.


116 posted on 03/04/2005 10:27:57 AM PST by streetpreacher (There will be no Trolls in heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

To: Quick1

This is funny. 24 cents? Ha! In washington state the price has already gone up 32 cents in the last two months.


118 posted on 03/04/2005 10:44:07 AM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: SMARTY

>>Yesterday morning $1.82

Yesterday evening - the same station $2.09 at 4 pm and $2.99 this morning.<<

They are gouging.

The price normally reflects the price paid for the last tanker of gas. Getting two tankers in less than 24 hours is a bit odd...


120 posted on 03/04/2005 10:49:16 AM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson