Skip to comments.
"EVAPORATED:" THE DAN AND DAVE SHOW (Michelle Malkin critiques Dan Rather's Farewell Tour)
Michelle Malkin's Blog ^
| March 4, 2005
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 03/04/2005 1:10:20 AM PST by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
03/04/2005 1:10:20 AM PST
by
Stoat
To: Stoat
2
posted on
03/04/2005 1:15:58 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
To: Stoat; GeronL
Michelle is great, but somebody needs to tell her that a Letterman-type "Top Ten" list counts down from 10 to 1, not up from 1 to 10.
To: snarks_when_bored
4
posted on
03/04/2005 1:22:26 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
To: GeronL
"That all evaporated"...
SNORK!!!!!!!!
5
posted on
03/04/2005 1:46:40 AM PST
by
Capn TrVth
(Yah! A little over the top, but who has more fun? ;>)
To: Stoat
Knowing the truth, watching Rather slither out is great entertainment.
6
posted on
03/04/2005 1:55:12 AM PST
by
Glenn
(The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
To: snarks_when_bored
That's because she "never usually" watches. A little lapse of skill there in an always usually decent writer.
7
posted on
03/04/2005 2:26:19 AM PST
by
NYpeanut
(gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, "Why did you lie to me?")
To: snarks_when_bored
Thought the same thing BUMP.
8
posted on
03/04/2005 2:51:47 AM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
To: Stoat
In the transcript, I only caught the word "evaporated" twice during the memogate segment and Letterman was the one using it each time.
9
posted on
03/04/2005 2:56:28 AM PST
by
Hatteras
To: Stoat
And as I went back and read the article, Michelle did say it was Letterman's word. Sorry MM.
10
posted on
03/04/2005 2:57:41 AM PST
by
Hatteras
To: Stoat
Michelle. What a gal! Sick baby, and still she has time to skewer Rather and company.
11
posted on
03/04/2005 3:00:39 AM PST
by
hershey
To: Glenn
I saw most of it..the lack of applause for Rather was telling..he also looked almost , well, pathetic...
12
posted on
03/04/2005 3:26:00 AM PST
by
ken5050
(The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
To: Stoat
I actually caught about 15 seconds of those two last night as I was channel surfing... When I heard Leterman say (something like) "well, they didn't prove that the documents were legitimate, but they didn't prove that they were fake, either..." At that point, I had heard enough.
Over and over again, the MSM reminds me of a line from the John Landis film "Amazon Women on the Moon." "Using undiscovered evidence, we now know that Jack the Ripper was really the Loch Ness Monster!"
Mark
13
posted on
03/04/2005 3:40:57 AM PST
by
MarkL
(That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
To: Stoat
14
posted on
03/04/2005 3:41:51 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Stoat
Why are all the smart, good-looking women conservative? Just a rhetorical question - no answer required.
To: Malesherbes
I got an answer to your rhetorical question.
'Cause beauty's more than skin deep.
16
posted on
03/04/2005 4:08:45 AM PST
by
GrannyAnnie
(as right as I can be)
To: Howlin
I saw your ping about deciding whether to watch Rather or Stewart. In case you watched Stewart, you'll want to read this.
17
posted on
03/04/2005 4:57:18 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: NYpeanut
Giving Michelle a break......having been on sick baby overnight duty myself a time or two.
18
posted on
03/04/2005 5:09:01 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
To: Stoat
With mapes marketing her book and this apparent cya fest on letterman, it appears the official talking point is going to be "fake but true".
Letterman has been in second place of the two man race for how many years?
To: GeronL
Note Rather's:
"We were not able to authenticate the documents as thoroughly as I think we should have, given a little more time perhaps we could have." [emphasis mine]
Given a little more time for what? If they needed more time to get to the truth why didn't they take it? The only reason Rather would say such a thing is because they were not interersted in the truth, there was an election coming up, and they were running out of time to influence the outcome.
Cordially,
20
posted on
03/04/2005 7:16:58 AM PST
by
Diamond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
