Skip to comments.
High Anxiety, Part II: Same 747 Flies Again On Three Engines
Wall Street Journal ^
| 3/4/2005
| SCOTT MCCARTNEY
Posted on 03/03/2005 11:06:24 PM PST by BurbankKarl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Paleo Conservative
To: BurbankKarl
"Witnesses saw sparks flying out of the engine and heard loud pops"
--> Come on folks, Nothing to see here, Move along!
3
posted on
03/03/2005 11:08:16 PM PST
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(Banning, A fate worse than death !!)
To: BurbankKarl
What is the joke about twin-engine planes... that the first engine failure will take you all the way to the crash site.
4
posted on
03/03/2005 11:09:36 PM PST
by
ikka
To: BurbankKarl
Singapore to London, I've flown that several times. It would be a real bummer to attempt an emergency landing in Iran.
5
posted on
03/03/2005 11:10:43 PM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: billorites; Kirkwood
To: BurbankKarl
7
posted on
03/03/2005 11:15:25 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: BurbankKarl
To: BurbankKarl
9
posted on
03/03/2005 11:19:13 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: BurbankKarl; MeekOneGOP
10
posted on
03/03/2005 11:21:38 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: BurbankKarl
11
posted on
03/03/2005 11:32:01 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Paleo Conservative
It is interesting that they lied about the mishap in England....the Boeing instruction is that if you are an hour into the flight, and have attained cruising altitude, you could continue.....wonder how this latest incident will be reported..
BA initially claimed that the engine had failed an hour into the flight. But the airline admitted yesterday that the problem had occurred a few seconds after take-off when the Boeing 747 was only 100ft above the ground.
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Yehuda
14
posted on
03/03/2005 11:46:17 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: BurbankKarl
DAMN, the Boing 747 is one fantastic airplane.
Take that, Air Bus!
15
posted on
03/03/2005 11:50:34 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: BurbankKarl
How do you lose an engine?? Did they misplace it?? Did they hide it under a rock in the Canary Islands?
16
posted on
03/04/2005 12:20:06 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
To: BurbankKarl
100ft above the ground?? YIKES!!!
17
posted on
03/04/2005 12:21:01 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
To: BurbankKarl
Adds a new meaning to "non-stop" flights.
To: ikka
What is the joke about twin-engine planes... that the first engine failure will take you all the way to the crash site. I only fly single engine airplanes. Seems to me, a twin engine aircraft is exactly twice as likely to lose an engine as a single.
19
posted on
03/04/2005 12:48:32 AM PST
by
C210N
To: Paleo Conservative
20
posted on
03/04/2005 6:20:20 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson