I actually think that Martha should be welcomed back to society, as should all people who have served their time. This may sound wierd, but I think that if society decides that XX years in prision is the correct punishment for a crime, then once a convict has served that term, it is incumbent upon society to recognize that the convict has paid the price and they should be allowed to return to society and, hopefully, become a contributing member of society. I think one of the big reasons that people become career criminals is that when they are released from prison, no one will hire them for a job, their friends and families shun them, etc. (Certainly there are some who make a life of crime no matter how people treat them, and they should be punished accordinly). If society thinks a crime deserves a tougher punishment, sentence them to such a punishment. But once a person has served the sentence society imposed on that person, the person should not be stigmatized for the rest of their life. A kid who does something wrong and gets grounded for a week doesn't get vilified and stigmatized by their parents once they've served their punishment (at least I hope not). Similarly, we should give people who have served their time a fresh start or at the very leaset the benefit of the doubt.
Then by all means, welcome her...after the ankle bracelet comes off.
"...it is incumbent upon society to recognize that the convict has paid the price and they should be allowed to return to society and, hopefully, become a contributing member of society."
For VERY minor crimes, I agree, but you must live in a neighborhood that doesn't announce and doesn't pass out fliers when the pedophile or rapist or firestarter or meth producer moves in down the block from you. Ignorance can be bliss, until the next child goes missing, or the next mother and daughter are tag-team raped, or the next garage "accidentally" catches on fire, or the next meth lab explodes, all of which have happened in Madison, WI, the Mecca of Liberals.
Not sure you'd be singing the same tune, were that the case where you live. As for me, time in jail means nothing. Jail is for punishement, not rehabilitation, and when people are sick and evil, it's society's responsibility to protect the rest of US from THEM.
This is very naive. Their best friends are usually other criminals. They probably don't know who their father is and mom is a crack-head or on welfare. Usually the first thing they do on getting out of prison is go get a fix of whatever got them in trouble in the first place. The next thing is to look up old buds from the hood. From there, it's steadily downhill until their next visit to the slammer.
The notion that most criminals try to get a job on release but cannot because of their record is just not accurate. For the most part, they don't even try. Even if they did, the tatoos, the silly pants, the inability to speak English, the 'tude, and the lack of any job experience other than pimping, drug distribution, jacking folks on buses, or whatever, assure that they will not get a job with much more certainty than their record.
And I just wanted to state that I'm not picking on you...I just think you either haven't thought this all the way through, or you've never lived in an area that has real perps back out on the streets and seen the continuing damage they do once they're out of jail again. :)
Absolutely 100% bullseye correct. Anything less is not only counter productive, hell it's just plain stupid. If you give $10.00 to a cafe for a good ol chicken fried steak dinner, then go back the next day for breakfast buffet, $4.99, I would be more that a bit p.o'ed if someone told me I still owed $2.00 from yesterday, just because.... Not only that, I have to pay cash, my credit card is no good.
Basically, I would be in their face telling them all about their ancestors.