Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States Presses Ahead with Anti-Abortion Amendment at UN (BBC, MSM Spread Contrary)
LifeSiteNews ^ | 3/3/2005 | n/a

Posted on 03/03/2005 10:55:27 AM PST by Pyro7480

United States Presses Ahead with Anti-Abortion Amendment at UN
Media reports that US is backing down are not correct

UNITED NATIONS, March 3, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Contrary to reports by the New York Times, Reuters and countless other news agencies, the United States is not backing down from its amendment to clarify that the 1995 Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action do not call for the right to abortion.

At a press briefing this morning, Antonia Kirkland from the pro-abortion NGO Equality Now asked U.S. Ambassador Ellen Sauerbrey, head of the U.S. delegation, if the US was withdrawing its amendment as reported by the New York Times. Ambassador Sauerbrey responded, “No.” She noted that the US would continue to work to pass the document to reaffirm the Beijing Declaration with its clarifying amendment.

Samantha Singson, a pro-life lobbyist at the United Nations representing Campaign Life Coalition, told LifeSiteNews.com that at a US NGO Caucus meeting, angry feminist activists hoped to force the US to withdraw its amendment by presenting a petitions signed by some 320 US organizations. They claimed that the US Ambassador did not represent her constituency and that the proposed US amendment did not represent the views of civil society.

However, in less than twelve hours the NGO pro-life and pro-family coalition was able to present over 800 letters from organizations around the world which support the US delegation’s amendment.

Austin Ruse of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Action League (C-Fam) noted that over 500,000 emails from over 50 countries have come into the various UN missions in support of the US amendment.

In her statement to the UN Commission on the Status of Women yesterday, Ambassador Sauerbrey was clear that the US concerns over abortion remained. “As colleagues in this meeting know, the United States has had concerns about efforts to mischaracterize the outcome documents of Beijing and Beijing+5 in creation of new international rights. It is clear that there was no intent on the part of States supporting the Beijing documents to create new rights . . . including the right to abortion,” she said.

She added, “The United States recognizes the International Conference on Population and Development principle that abortion policies are a matter of national sovereignty. And, we are pleased that so many other governments have indicated their agreement with this position.”

To send a letter of support for the US anti-abortion amendment email: usmission@gmail.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; bbc; csw; msm; un; us; women
BBC, Reuters, et al caught in a lie (again)...
1 posted on 03/03/2005 10:55:27 AM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; NYer; Coleus

Pro-life ping!


2 posted on 03/03/2005 10:59:22 AM PST by Pyro7480 ("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

We're one of only six nations that allow abortion on demand. Why aren't any other countries helping us block this?


3 posted on 03/03/2005 11:00:22 AM PST by Righty_McRight ("Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter" Proverbs 24:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

They're probably listening to the enligtened opinions of the US Supreme Court. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.


4 posted on 03/03/2005 11:03:12 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: cotton1706
They're probably listening to the enligtened opinions of the US Supreme Court.

Silly us. We forgot. Of course the court has the right to manufacture any right it wants to, even if a legislature would never dare. Why, the enlightened court can even manufacture a right to kill children, and the president, as servant of the people, should listen to the nine unelected ones.

I think the court should actually begin wearing red robes, with horns coming out the back--something like the monsters of "The Village." It would represent a move toward truth in advertising.
6 posted on 03/03/2005 6:19:59 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson