Posted on 03/03/2005 8:23:18 AM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
Prior to the late 19th century, nothing was known of the Hittites outside the Bible, and many critics alleged that they were an invention of the biblical authors.In 1876 a dramatic discovery changed this perception. A British scholar named A. H. Sayce found inscriptions carved on rocks in Turkey. He suspected that they might be evidence of the Hittite nation. Ten years later, more clay tablets were found in Turkey at a place called Boghaz-koy. German cuneiform expert Hugo Winckler investigated the tablets and began his own expedition at the site in 1906.
I did it for 10 years. It was great fun but work is hard to come by, so to actually make a living doing it without being independently wealthy is very hard.
I still miss it and think perhaps I ought to go into teaching so I can still do digs and surveys in the summers. It was a great combination of cerebral and physical exercise.
Hebrew is a semitic language. It has roots in earlier semitic languages.
Bump!
How do you figure that, given that the "nature did it" view was the result of many centuries of work by the "open-minded and curious", who as a result discovered that far more than had been previously suspected, nature does indeed "do it"?
To someone familiar with the history of science and the rise of human knowledge, your statement seems quite inaccurate.
If you're just going to post a bigoted slur, feel free to leave me off your ping list.
And to boot, your rant is a non sequitur to the article itself.
And there wasn't a Holocaust.
According to Trevor Bryce, Life and Society in the Hittite World (Oxford University Press, 2002), "our Biblical Hittites with their Semitic names have little if anything to do with the earlier people so called, who occupied central Anatolia..."
But Bryce allows that there may be a connection between some later Hittites or "Neo-Hittites" in Syria (the earlier Hittite Empire fell around 1200 B.C.) and groups of Hittites mentioned in the Bible at 2 Kings 7:6 and in 2 Chronicles 1:17. The mention in 2 Kings is in the time of Elisha (9th century B.C.) whereas the 2 Chronicles passage is in the time of Solomon.
Science is not a justification for atheism, though many treat it that way (e.g. infidels.org).
IMHO, it is like a pendulum swinging over the millennia. At one time in the days of Galileo for instance science was an arm of the church and it had to comply with that particular church doctrine.
Now the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction, and science seeks to distance itself from all theology even going to the extremes (in some cases) of denying all universals, beginnings and anything else which does not take a physical form.
But universals and beginnings and the ilk are in the domain of mathematics and physics and thus the pendulum is now moving in the opposite direction as these disciplines become more involved with biology, chemistry and such.
Hopefully we will see balance in our lifetime where science is ideologically neutral and quits slamming doors altogether.
This is nothing new. I have a collection of pre-1930 world history books in which Israel and Christ are given more prominence as the books get older. This is a phenomenon similar to that in evolutionary circles: The truth is not the objective; The obliteration of the Creator and His interaction with man in history is. If one strays too far from the plantation in either field, he can't get work.
To whom would you be referring?
ping
An excellent example. They (irrationally) assumed that the Bible was always wrong. That is still assumed today even though biblical history has never been wrong.
For some time now, Arabs have been digging under the Temple Mount, hauling out truck loads of archeological artifacts, columns, etc., clearly evidence of Jewish/historical buildings, stables, whatever. They've taken all this to the town dump. I'm hoping Jewish scholars and archeologists have rescued everything and are trying to put smashed artifacts back together, but so far haven't heard anything. (Maybe the less said, the better, lest the Arabs destroy everything instead of leaving it at the dump.) Meanwhile, the foundation of the Temple Mount is getting shaky. What a bunch of idiots.
Of course, the ideal set up is to get a post
with a decent college then move on to a wealthy
museum...and that would take decades unless
you attain an influential sponsor, or Dad had
been making sizeable contributions for years! <>g,>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.