Posted on 03/02/2005 3:17:23 PM PST by LostInBayport
Pinkett Smith’s Remarks Debated
After some students were offended by Jada Pinkett Smith’s comments at Saturday’s Cultural Rhythms show, the Bisexual, Gay, Lesbian, Transgender, and Supporters Alliance (BGLTSA) and the Harvard Foundation for Intercultural and Race Relations have begun working together to increase sensitivity toward issues of sexuality at Harvard. Students said that some of Pinkett Smith’s remarks concerning appropriate gender roles were specific to heterosexual relationships.
In a press release circulated yesterday by the BGLTSA—and developed in coordination with the Foundation—the BGLTSA called for an apology from the Foundation and encouraged future discussion of the issue.
According to the Foundation’s Student Advisory Committee (SAC) Co-Chair Yannis M. Paulus ’05, the two groups have already planned concrete ways to address the concerns that Pinkett Smith’s speech rose.
The BGLTSA release acknowledged that the Foundation was not responsible for Pinkett Smith’s comments. But the Foundation has pledged to “take responsibility to inform future speakers that they will be speaking to an audience diverse in race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, gender and class,” according to the release.
Pinkett Smith was honored as the Foundation’s “Artist of the Year” at its 20th annual Cultural Rhythms show, which she also hosted.
BGLTSA Co-Chair Jordan B. Woods ’06 said that, while many BGLTSA members thought Pinkett Smith’s speech was “motivational,” some were insulted because they thought she narrowly defined the roles of men and women in relationships.
“Some of the content was extremely heteronormative, and made BGLTSA members feel uncomfortable,” he said.
Calling the comments heteronormative, according to Woods, means they implied that standard sexual relationships are only between males and females.
“Our position is that the comments weren’t homophobic, but the content was specific to male-female relationships,” Woods said.
Margaret C. D. Barusch ’06, the other BGLTSA co-chair, said the comments might have seemed insensitive in effect, if not in intent.
“I think the comments had a very strong focus for an extended period of time on how to effectively be in a relationship—a heterosexual relationship,” Barusch said. “I don’t think she meant to be offensive but I just don’t think she was that thoughtful.”
In order to discuss these concerns and ensure that such a misunderstanding doesn’t occur again, Paulus said the BGLTSA and the Foundation are planning a joint breakfast later this week as well as a general discussion forum for all of the SAC member groups.
Paulus added that the Foundation will issue a letter later this week apologizing for any offense the show might have caused and encouraging concerned students to attend the planned discussions.
According to Paulus, the letter will acknowledge that “Pinkett Smith was just giving the story of her life. She just told things from her perspective, and her perspective was a heterosexual perspective. She wasn’t trying to be offensive. But some felt she was taking a narrow view, and some people felt left out.”
Barusch said the dialogue with the Foundation has been “productive.”
“Both groups have really talked about issues of intercultural relationships and sexuality and the way that student groups can talk about these topics in sensitive ways,” she said.
Barusch also referred to a “minor controversy” that occurred earlier this year, in which some members of SAC questioned the BGLTSA’s role in the Foundation.
“They weren’t sure how the BGLTSA would fit into the Foundation...There was some conversation about the relevance of queer issues,” she said.
But Barusch emphasized that the Foundation has been very supportive of the BGLTSA’s efforts to address this weekend’s comments, stressing that the two incidents are unrelated.
“We’re not blaming the Foundation. It’s not about blame. It’s about how we all need to think more about what we’re saying,” she said.
Ofole U. “Fofie” Mgbako ’08, a performer in the Cultural Rhythms show who watched Pinkett Smith’s speech, said he thought the speech was “insightful.”
“You can never appeal to every single group,” he said. “You’ll always in some way be exclusive. I thought her message was clear. I thought it was sincere.”
—Liz C. Goodwin contributed to the reporting of this story.
I had to share this latest example of INSANITY with everyone...Free speech is dead in academia, folks.
I've read this article multiple times, and Pinket Smith's comments are nowhere to be found. What kind of reporting is this?
What did she say?
Welcome to FR, and welcome to something most here have known for a long time. At least one outta two is good ;)
Good first post; thank you and welcome.
This is INSANITY.
Isn't that telling that the author doesn't quote her? I gather the complaining is over the fact that she wasn't 'inclusive' of every possible group in existence. I guess she spoke about what she felt like, instead of running her speech by the Inclusiveness Police.
Basically, her 'offense' is thinking of a couple as a man and a woman.
Where are her comments???
Will Smith is a lefty so I would be highly surprised if her comments were in any way "offensive".
So now you don't even have to be "homophobic" to get the PC police on your case? You just have to be "heteronormative"? I...I just can't think of words in the language that could describe this MADNESS. I must engage in a carthartic Dean Scream: YEEEAAAAAAAARRRRGH!!!!
HOMO AGENDA ALERT! Now anyone who speaks at Harvard on relationships and REAL LIFE must be knowledgeable about how it 'works' for homosexuals, as well as heterosexuals. If one's own life experience includes only the heterosexual side, that's no longer good enough. One must have also experienced, or at least researched, homosexual relationships in order to cover the whole topic, according to these whiners. If they win here, I look for this to open the floodgates to bring this crap to the high schools, then middle schools, all the way to preschoolers. 'Heather Has Two Mommies' will have nothing on this.
What, exactly, did she say that was so offensive?
Surely you dont think that the heterosexual relationship, the foundation of civilization for the past few thousand years, as practiced by 98% of the population is normal?
You sound like you are in need of political re-education comrade! Up is down, Bad is good, and 2+2=5. You'll believe it by the time they're done :P
A linguistic redundancy. "Hetero" is by definition, "normative." It's like saying "Crimson red" or "past history." The left may be able to sell this Noam Chomsky psycholinguistic bull durham in Massachusetts, but it'll never play in the red states.
Apparently this is a group that also opposes identifying gender on bathrooms as well...wow
A fact that merits explanation only in places where liberalism is allowed to survive.
what do you expect a married woman with kids to say?
I don't know, but apparently it was very heteronormative.
Ah,the concerns of the idle rich.Are these students so desperate for issues that they have to go bonkers over what some Hollywood glamour queen says in a speech?
Wish I had those kind of problems.
IronJack, don't even try do analyze or decipher the thinkery-dialect. They've created it in attempt to make their lunacy seem like reason. If you actually try understand it to much, you'll blow a hole your head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.